A response to ‘Quantifying phenotypic plasticity at multiple levels—A comment on Gómez et al.’

Abstract In this reply, we clarify several conceptual misunderstandings raised in response to our Perspective on quantifying phenotypic plasticity. We emphasize that our central argument concerns the rigorous estimation of the magnitude of plasticity, rather than its mere detection. Moreover, an explicit consideration of genotype—or valid proxies thereof—is necessary to distinguish environmental variance from genotype‐by‐environment (G × E) interactions. Although phenotypic plasticity can be examined across multiple levels of biological organization, its accurate quantification ultimately depends on a genotype–environment framework that underlies phenotypic expression. We hope that this exchange helps refine methodological standards and fosters a more precise understanding of the evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70278
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A response to ‘Quantifying phenotypic plasticity at multiple levels—A comment on Gómez et al.’

Francisco Perfectti, Adela González‐Megías, Cristina Armas, José M. Gómez
Functional Ecology
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

A response to ‘Quantifying phenotypic plasticity at multiple levels—A comment on Gómez et al.’

Francisco Perfectti, Adela González‐Megías, Cristina Armas, José M. Gómez
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this reply, we clarify several conceptual misunderstandings raised in response to our Perspective on quantifying phenotypic plasticity. We emphasize that our central argument concerns the rigorous estimation of the magnitude of plasticity, rather than its mere detection. Moreover, an explicit consideration of genotype—or valid proxies thereof—is necessary to distinguish environmental variance from genotype‐by‐environment (G × E) interactions. Although phenotypic plasticity can be examined across multiple levels of biological organization, its accurate quantification ultimately depends on a genotype–environment framework that underlies phenotypic expression. We hope that this exchange helps refine methodological standards and fosters a more precise understanding of the evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 40(3)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.