Insecure, detached, and unfaithful: Propensity towards infidelity as predicted by authenticity, emotional intimacy and insecure attachment styles

Individuals with insecure attachment styles have been found to be more likely to commit acts of infidelity, but the psychological dynamics underlying this link are not yet understood. The aim of our cross-sectional study was to explore the potential predictive roles of one personal trait (i.e., authenticity), one individual factor reflected in the dyadic context (i.e., insecure attachment styles) and one relationship characteristic (i.e., emotional intimacy) on propensity towards infidelity. A sample of 307 Romanians in a current committed relationship, aged between 18 and 60 ( M = 29.98, SD = 9.37) filled in measures of attachment styles, authenticity, emotional intimacy, propensity towards infidelity, and personal and relationships demographics. Results showed that insecure attachment styles were positively associated with propensity towards infidelity and negatively related to authenticity and emotional intimacy. Also, propensity towards infidelity was significantly and negatively predicted by authenticity and emotional intimacy when controlling for effects of insecure attachment styles, gender and age. This pattern of relationships suggests the plausibility of complex models of effects of insecure attachment on infidelity, by which authenticity and emotional intimacy may represent intermediate factors, therefore pinpointing distinct individual and relational dynamics by which insecure attachment styles may increase the likelihood of infidelity in committed relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2026.113758
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insecure, detached, and unfaithful: Propensity towards infidelity as predicted by authenticity, emotional intimacy and insecure attachment styles

Teodora-ELena Huțanu, Andrei Corneliu Holman
Personality and Individual Differences
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Insecure, detached, and unfaithful: Propensity towards infidelity as predicted by authenticity, emotional intimacy and insecure attachment styles

Teodora-ELena Huțanu, Andrei Corneliu Holman
article en

Abstract

Individuals with insecure attachment styles have been found to be more likely to commit acts of infidelity, but the psychological dynamics underlying this link are not yet understood. The aim of our cross-sectional study was to explore the potential predictive roles of one personal trait (i.e., authenticity), one individual factor reflected in the dyadic context (i.e., insecure attachment styles) and one relationship characteristic (i.e., emotional intimacy) on propensity towards infidelity. A sample of 307 Romanians in a current committed relationship, aged between 18 and 60 ( M = 29.98, SD = 9.37) filled in measures of attachment styles, authenticity, emotional intimacy, propensity towards infidelity, and personal and relationships demographics. Results showed that insecure attachment styles were positively associated with propensity towards infidelity and negatively related to authenticity and emotional intimacy. Also, propensity towards infidelity was significantly and negatively predicted by authenticity and emotional intimacy when controlling for effects of insecure attachment styles, gender and age. This pattern of relationships suggests the plausibility of complex models of effects of insecure attachment on infidelity, by which authenticity and emotional intimacy may represent intermediate factors, therefore pinpointing distinct individual and relational dynamics by which insecure attachment styles may increase the likelihood of infidelity in committed relationships.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 257
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.