Multi‐Source Rainfall Erosivity Fusion Based on Machine Learning Models

ABSTRACT High‐accuracy rainfall erosivity (RE) data are essential for understanding soil erosion processes. However, considerable differences exist among various precipitation datasets in terms of RE estimation. This study aimed to develop a machine learning‐based framework for multisource RE fusion to increase the accuracy and spatial consistency of RE estimation. To achieve this goal, RE data derived from station observations were used as a benchmark to systematically evaluate the performance characteristics of five commonly used gridded precipitation datasets (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data [CHIRPS], CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and fifth‐generation atmospheric reanalysis data from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts [ERA5]) in estimating RE across mainland China from 1983 to 2020, thereby identifying their biases. A machine learning‐based multisource RE fusion framework was subsequently established by employing six algorithms, namely, linear regression (LR), decision tree regression (DTR), random forest (RF), extra trees regressor (ETR), extreme gradient boost (XGB), and gradient boosting machine (GBM), to integrate RE estimates from the above five data sources. The results revealed that (1) the station‐interpolated precipitation products (CHM and CN05.1) outperformed the reanalysis dataset (ERA5), yet all five gridded datasets (CHIRPS, CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and ERA5) generally exhibited RE underestimation; (2) the fused RE product provided a significantly increased estimation accuracy, with the average root mean square error (RMSE) decreasing from 1826.21 to 1077.06 MJ mm ha −1 h −1 and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient increasing from 0.67 to 0.89. The fusion method effectively corrected the common issues of the underestimation of high‐intensity RE events (large and heavy RE) and the overestimation of moderate RE events observed in the five original datasets (CHIRPS, CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and ERA5); and (3) the fused RE dataset achieved significant improvements in complex and observation‐sparse regions, such as the Tibetan Plateau (the average NSE increased from −0.30 to 0.60). Overall, the potential of machine learning‐based fusion methods in enhancing RE estimation was demonstrated, and a high‐resolution fused RE dataset that could serve as a reliable foundation for soil erosion assessment and land management was provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70496
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐Source Rainfall Erosivity Fusion Based on Machine Learning Models

yulian wang, Wenyan Wang, Manyu Dong, Qian Liu et al.
Land Degradation and Development
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Multi‐Source Rainfall Erosivity Fusion Based on Machine Learning Models

yulian wang, Wenyan Wang, Manyu Dong, Qian Liu, Chenxi Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT High‐accuracy rainfall erosivity (RE) data are essential for understanding soil erosion processes. However, considerable differences exist among various precipitation datasets in terms of RE estimation. This study aimed to develop a machine learning‐based framework for multisource RE fusion to increase the accuracy and spatial consistency of RE estimation. To achieve this goal, RE data derived from station observations were used as a benchmark to systematically evaluate the performance characteristics of five commonly used gridded precipitation datasets (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data [CHIRPS], CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and fifth‐generation atmospheric reanalysis data from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts [ERA5]) in estimating RE across mainland China from 1983 to 2020, thereby identifying their biases. A machine learning‐based multisource RE fusion framework was subsequently established by employing six algorithms, namely, linear regression (LR), decision tree regression (DTR), random forest (RF), extra trees regressor (ETR), extreme gradient boost (XGB), and gradient boosting machine (GBM), to integrate RE estimates from the above five data sources. The results revealed that (1) the station‐interpolated precipitation products (CHM and CN05.1) outperformed the reanalysis dataset (ERA5), yet all five gridded datasets (CHIRPS, CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and ERA5) generally exhibited RE underestimation; (2) the fused RE product provided a significantly increased estimation accuracy, with the average root mean square error (RMSE) decreasing from 1826.21 to 1077.06 MJ mm ha −1 h −1 and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient increasing from 0.67 to 0.89. The fusion method effectively corrected the common issues of the underestimation of high‐intensity RE events (large and heavy RE) and the overestimation of moderate RE events observed in the five original datasets (CHIRPS, CPC, CN05.1, CHM, and ERA5); and (3) the fused RE dataset achieved significant improvements in complex and observation‐sparse regions, such as the Tibetan Plateau (the average NSE increased from −0.30 to 0.60). Overall, the potential of machine learning‐based fusion methods in enhancing RE estimation was demonstrated, and a high‐resolution fused RE dataset that could serve as a reliable foundation for soil erosion assessment and land management was provided.

Land Degradation and Development
Peking University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.