Prediction of Pipeline Defect Depth and Classification Based on CatBoost

ABSTRACT Magnetic flux leakage detection is a well‐established non‐destructive in‐line inspection for pipelines. In practical applications, the volume of inspection data is large, and manually labeling of defects is time‐consuming and inefficient. Automated processing of inspection data using machine learning methods can address these issues. This study evaluates the performance of four machine learning models in defect classification and defect depth prediction. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is employed to increase the number of minority class samples, enhancing the model's generalization ability and thereby improving the classification accuracy for minority class defects. The prediction results showed that the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model had a defect classification accuracy of 0.9730, a mean squared error of 0.0256 for defect depth prediction, and a prediction residual range of −1 to 1.1 mm. The CatBoost model had the advantages of high classification accuracy, a small prediction error, and a residual range. The study results provided a reference for predicting pipeline defect types and defect depths using machine learning models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70486
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Pipeline Defect Depth and Classification Based on CatBoost

Cong Chen, Dongcun Qin, Guanwei Jia, Rui Li
Energy Science & Engineering
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Prediction of Pipeline Defect Depth and Classification Based on CatBoost

Cong Chen, Dongcun Qin, Guanwei Jia, Rui Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Magnetic flux leakage detection is a well‐established non‐destructive in‐line inspection for pipelines. In practical applications, the volume of inspection data is large, and manually labeling of defects is time‐consuming and inefficient. Automated processing of inspection data using machine learning methods can address these issues. This study evaluates the performance of four machine learning models in defect classification and defect depth prediction. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is employed to increase the number of minority class samples, enhancing the model's generalization ability and thereby improving the classification accuracy for minority class defects. The prediction results showed that the Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) model had a defect classification accuracy of 0.9730, a mean squared error of 0.0256 for defect depth prediction, and a prediction residual range of −1 to 1.1 mm. The CatBoost model had the advantages of high classification accuracy, a small prediction error, and a residual range. The study results provided a reference for predicting pipeline defect types and defect depths using machine learning models.

Energy Science & Engineering
Henan University (CN), Line Corporation (Japan) (JP), Henan Bioengineering Technology Research Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prediction of Pipeline Defect Depth and Classification Based on CatBoost — Cong Chen, Dongcun Qin, et al. · Energy Science & Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS