Courting Confidence in Probation: Unpacking Organisational Legitimacy Within the Criminal Justice System

ABSTRACT In this article, we address the hitherto neglected question of how sentencers and other professional actors in the criminal courts think about the legitimacy of probation services. We deploy a framework from the organisational studies literature, which suggests three dimensions of legitimacy that organisations seek from their stakeholders: pragmatic, moral and cognitive. Drawing on empirical research conducted in England and Wales, we find a mixed picture, with the Probation Service experiencing a crisis of pragmatic legitimacy in the eyes of court actors but performing more strongly in respect of cognitive and moral legitimacy. We argue that the analysis presented in this article not only helps us to understand the opportunities and challenges for the probation service in building legitimacy vis‐a‐vis the courts but that it also serves as a case study that could inform future research on (inter‐)organisational legitimacy in the criminal justice field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.70033
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Courting Confidence in Probation: Unpacking Organisational Legitimacy Within the Criminal Justice System

Matthew Millings, Harry Annison, Nicola Carr, Dr Gwen Robinson et al.
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Courting Confidence in Probation: Unpacking Organisational Legitimacy Within the Criminal Justice System

Matthew Millings, Harry Annison, Nicola Carr, Dr Gwen Robinson, Lawrence Burke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we address the hitherto neglected question of how sentencers and other professional actors in the criminal courts think about the legitimacy of probation services. We deploy a framework from the organisational studies literature, which suggests three dimensions of legitimacy that organisations seek from their stakeholders: pragmatic, moral and cognitive. Drawing on empirical research conducted in England and Wales, we find a mixed picture, with the Probation Service experiencing a crisis of pragmatic legitimacy in the eyes of court actors but performing more strongly in respect of cognitive and moral legitimacy. We argue that the analysis presented in this article not only helps us to understand the opportunities and challenges for the probation service in building legitimacy vis‐a‐vis the courts but that it also serves as a case study that could inform future research on (inter‐)organisational legitimacy in the criminal justice field.

The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Southampton (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Courting Confidence in Probation: Unpacking Organisational Legitimacy Within the Criminal Justice System — Matthew Millings, Harry Annison, et al. · The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS