Education for Problems of Sustainable Development

ABSTRACT The Cynefin framework for decision‐making categorizes problem environments into simple (known knowns), complicated (known unknowns), complex (unknown unknowns), and chaotic (unknowables). Simple and complicated problem environments enable best and good solutions, but complex and chaotic problem environments require emergent and novel solutions. Arguing that sustainability problems are complex and chaotic, this study applies the Cynefin framework of decision‐making in complex and chaotic problem environments as a lens for sensemaking and reframing of sustainability competencies, resulting in proposing a suite of sustainability competencies to address complex and chaotic problems. Five competencies are proposed and defined, including: reflective action, critical systems thinking, boundary spanning, active empathy, and pathfinding. These are the first suite of sustainability competencies that are problem‐based, processual, and integrated in nature, involving a sequential relationship between the competencies grounded on the Cynefin problem‐solving steps. This enables systematic learning of these competencies in a single instructional project, hence facilitating deep relational learning. Furthermore, the study proposes an instructional design that situates learning of these competencies in human cognitive architecture to reduce extraneous cognitive load on the limited working memory and encourage long‐term memory construction. The study hypothesizes that each competence is best learned through a tailored set of the nine human intelligences identified by the theory of multiple intelligences. For example, the competence of critical systems thinking, defined as the ability to account for known, unknown, and unknowable relationships in a problem context, is best learned through logical‐mathematical intelligence and spatial intelligence—which help analyze known problem relationships, naturalistic intelligence—which helps reflect on unknown problem relationships, and existential intelligence which helps consider unknowable problem relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70837
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education for Problems of Sustainable Development

Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat
Sustainable Development
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Education for Problems of Sustainable Development

Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Cynefin framework for decision‐making categorizes problem environments into simple (known knowns), complicated (known unknowns), complex (unknown unknowns), and chaotic (unknowables). Simple and complicated problem environments enable best and good solutions, but complex and chaotic problem environments require emergent and novel solutions. Arguing that sustainability problems are complex and chaotic, this study applies the Cynefin framework of decision‐making in complex and chaotic problem environments as a lens for sensemaking and reframing of sustainability competencies, resulting in proposing a suite of sustainability competencies to address complex and chaotic problems. Five competencies are proposed and defined, including: reflective action, critical systems thinking, boundary spanning, active empathy, and pathfinding. These are the first suite of sustainability competencies that are problem‐based, processual, and integrated in nature, involving a sequential relationship between the competencies grounded on the Cynefin problem‐solving steps. This enables systematic learning of these competencies in a single instructional project, hence facilitating deep relational learning. Furthermore, the study proposes an instructional design that situates learning of these competencies in human cognitive architecture to reduce extraneous cognitive load on the limited working memory and encourage long‐term memory construction. The study hypothesizes that each competence is best learned through a tailored set of the nine human intelligences identified by the theory of multiple intelligences. For example, the competence of critical systems thinking, defined as the ability to account for known, unknown, and unknowable relationships in a problem context, is best learned through logical‐mathematical intelligence and spatial intelligence—which help analyze known problem relationships, naturalistic intelligence—which helps reflect on unknown problem relationships, and existential intelligence which helps consider unknowable problem relationships.

Sustainable Development
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Education for Problems of Sustainable Development — Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat · Sustainable Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS