Clinical evaluation of a motion correction software based on partial angle reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

To evaluate a new deep learning (DL) motion correction (MC) software based on partial angle reconstruction (PAR) to reduce motion artifacts in patients with increased heart rate (HR) in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). This retrospective single-center study included consecutive patients with HR > 70 bpm who underwent single-beat wide-area-detector CCTA over a 6-month period. A DL PAR-based MC software was applied to each image, and corrected and uncorrected reconstructions were scored by two blinded independent cardiothoracic radiologists for coronary motion artifact severity. Scores were obtained on a per-vessel and on a per-patient level using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = non-interpretable, 2 = severe, 3 = moderate, 4 = mild, 5 = no artifacts). Scoring differences were analyzed with Chi-Squared test and interrater agreement with Gwet agreement coefficients. 62 patients (35 female) with (mean ± std.dev.) BMI 29.4 ± 6.8 kg/m2 and HR 81.9 ± 13.1 bpm were included. Without MC, the number of cases scored 3 or higher on a per-patient level were 40/62 (64.5%) and 43/62 (69.4%), respectively for reader 1 and 2. With MC, they improved to 50/62 (80.6%) and 55/62 (88.7%), respectively for reader 1 and 2. Improvements in scoring were significant for both readers (p < 0.02). Per-vessel scores followed a similar trend, but showed significance for both readers only for the right coronary artery (p < 0.001). The fraction of diagnostically-interpretable cases (score ≥ 2) were 91.9% (uncorrected) and 98.4% (motion-corrected) (reader 1), and 93.5% (uncorrected) and 96.8% (motion-corrected) (reader 2). Interrater agreement was between (0.67-0.78). The MC software significantly improved image quality by reducing coronary motion artifacts in CCTA patients with increased HR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-026-03678-w
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical evaluation of a motion correction software based on partial angle reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

Sue Thomas, Joanne D. Schuijf, Matthew Benbow, Russell Bull et al.
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Clinical evaluation of a motion correction software based on partial angle reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

Sue Thomas, Joanne D. Schuijf, Matthew Benbow, Russell Bull, Laura McLennan, Marco Caballo, Mark Condron, Andrea Foden
article en

Abstract

To evaluate a new deep learning (DL) motion correction (MC) software based on partial angle reconstruction (PAR) to reduce motion artifacts in patients with increased heart rate (HR) in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). This retrospective single-center study included consecutive patients with HR > 70 bpm who underwent single-beat wide-area-detector CCTA over a 6-month period. A DL PAR-based MC software was applied to each image, and corrected and uncorrected reconstructions were scored by two blinded independent cardiothoracic radiologists for coronary motion artifact severity. Scores were obtained on a per-vessel and on a per-patient level using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = non-interpretable, 2 = severe, 3 = moderate, 4 = mild, 5 = no artifacts). Scoring differences were analyzed with Chi-Squared test and interrater agreement with Gwet agreement coefficients. 62 patients (35 female) with (mean ± std.dev.) BMI 29.4 ± 6.8 kg/m2 and HR 81.9 ± 13.1 bpm were included. Without MC, the number of cases scored 3 or higher on a per-patient level were 40/62 (64.5%) and 43/62 (69.4%), respectively for reader 1 and 2. With MC, they improved to 50/62 (80.6%) and 55/62 (88.7%), respectively for reader 1 and 2. Improvements in scoring were significant for both readers (p < 0.02). Per-vessel scores followed a similar trend, but showed significance for both readers only for the right coronary artery (p < 0.001). The fraction of diagnostically-interpretable cases (score ≥ 2) were 91.9% (uncorrected) and 98.4% (motion-corrected) (reader 1), and 93.5% (uncorrected) and 96.8% (motion-corrected) (reader 2). Interrater agreement was between (0.67-0.78). The MC software significantly improved image quality by reducing coronary motion artifacts in CCTA patients with increased HR.

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Canon (Japan) (JP), Royal Bournemouth Hospital (GB), Stryker (Netherlands) (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.