Who Cares About the Conditions? Modern Slavery in Global Supply Chain Practises: A Transnational Agenda to Promote Decent, Inclusive and Sustainable Practises

ABSTRACT This study provides an extensive review of modern slavery practises within the global supply chain, highlighting it as a significant human rights violation that affects both the well‐being of victims and the overall supply chain performance of organisations. Using secondary data from the Scopus database, we identify critical gaps and propose practical and theoretical approaches to mitigate modern slavery. The findings indicate that globalisation and neo‐trade liberalism exacerbate modern slavery across various forms, including forced labour, child labour, labour exploitation, human trafficking, underpaid wages, coercion and debt bondage, particularly within sectors such as agriculture, fishing, construction, apparel and fashion, mining and transportation. Furthermore, we examine the effectiveness of regional and national laws, including the UN Principles on Human Right and Business, UK Modern Slavery Act of 2015, Australia's Modern Slavery Act of 2018, the California Transparency in Supply Chain Act of 2010, the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act 2021, and Franch Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law of 2017, and find that while these legislative frameworks are effective at downstream levels of supply chains in developed nations, their impact is limited upstream, particularly in developing countries hindered by weak legal systems and prevailing socioeconomic challenges such as poverty, unemployemnt, food insecurity and gender dispartities which, continue to perpetuate social injustices. Additionally, we observe a troubling trend of inadequate financial investment in anti‐slavery initiatives, coupled with poor collaboration between scholars in the global south and north, which undermines efforts to combat modern slavery, particularly in less developed regions. To address these theoretical gaps, we propose a Modern Slavery Diffusion Model, alongside practical and policy‐level implications aimed at effectively tackling modern slavery issues in global supply chain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy & Development
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70289
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Cares About the Conditions? Modern Slavery in Global Supply Chain Practises: A Transnational Agenda to Promote Decent, Inclusive and Sustainable Practises

Kingsley Kofi Arthur, Peter Darko, Sampson Adom, Omega Hlortu et al.
Business Strategy & Development
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Who Cares About the Conditions? Modern Slavery in Global Supply Chain Practises: A Transnational Agenda to Promote Decent, Inclusive and Sustainable Practises

Kingsley Kofi Arthur, Peter Darko, Sampson Adom, Omega Hlortu, Simplice A. Asongu, Emmanuel Frimpong
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study provides an extensive review of modern slavery practises within the global supply chain, highlighting it as a significant human rights violation that affects both the well‐being of victims and the overall supply chain performance of organisations. Using secondary data from the Scopus database, we identify critical gaps and propose practical and theoretical approaches to mitigate modern slavery. The findings indicate that globalisation and neo‐trade liberalism exacerbate modern slavery across various forms, including forced labour, child labour, labour exploitation, human trafficking, underpaid wages, coercion and debt bondage, particularly within sectors such as agriculture, fishing, construction, apparel and fashion, mining and transportation. Furthermore, we examine the effectiveness of regional and national laws, including the UN Principles on Human Right and Business, UK Modern Slavery Act of 2015, Australia's Modern Slavery Act of 2018, the California Transparency in Supply Chain Act of 2010, the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act 2021, and Franch Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law of 2017, and find that while these legislative frameworks are effective at downstream levels of supply chains in developed nations, their impact is limited upstream, particularly in developing countries hindered by weak legal systems and prevailing socioeconomic challenges such as poverty, unemployemnt, food insecurity and gender dispartities which, continue to perpetuate social injustices. Additionally, we observe a troubling trend of inadequate financial investment in anti‐slavery initiatives, coupled with poor collaboration between scholars in the global south and north, which undermines efforts to combat modern slavery, particularly in less developed regions. To address these theoretical gaps, we propose a Modern Slavery Diffusion Model, alongside practical and policy‐level implications aimed at effectively tackling modern slavery issues in global supply chain.

Business Strategy & DevelopmentVol. 9(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Kumasi Technical University (GH), University of Energy and Natural Resources (GH), Interstate Commission for Water Coordination of Central Asia (UZ), Advanced Institute of Convergence Technology (KR), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.