Improving land cover change modeling with machine learning: comparative analysis of SVM and XGBoost in Lesotho Lowlands

The Lowlands of Lesotho are critical for socio-economic growth, hosting significant activities and infrastructure, yet they face pressures from population growth, urbanisation, and land degradation. This study assessed the performance of two leading machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), in predicting land cover change from 1993 to 2039. The findings revealed a critical insight into model validation: while SVM consistently achieved higher quantitative accuracy (overall accuracy: 87–94%, Kappa coefficient: 0.83–0.92) compared to XGBoost (overall accuracy: 84–93%, Kappa coefficient: 0.79–0.90), qualitative assessment indicated that SVM produced an implausible spatiotemporal trend for built-up areas, exhibiting a pattern of increasing in 1993, decreasing in 2009, and increasing again in 2024, which contradicted known historical development in the Lowlands. This demonstrates that relying solely on accuracy metrics is insufficient for ensuring a robust workflow. By selecting the more plausible XGBoost results, the study provides a reliable analysis of historical land use/land cover (LULC) dynamics and a credible future prediction. Change detection results from XGBoost indicated an increase of 53.5% in built-up area between 1993 and 2024, a net gain of 2.3% in vegetation, a decrease of 9.6% in bare land, and a decline of 38.6% in water bodies. CA-Markov predicted the continuation of these observed trends between 2024 and 2039, with built-up area increasing by 5.2%, vegetation by 4.8%, bare land decreasing by 9.6%, and water declining by 3.8%. These insights are critical for supporting evidence-based and sustainable land use planning and management in Lesotho’s most vulnerable agroecological zone. SVM performed well, achieving accuracy rates of 92.7%, 94.27%, and 87.5% for the years 1993, 2009, and 2024, respectively, with kappa values ranging from 0.83 to 0.92. GBoost yielded lower accuracy rates of 90.62%, 92.71%, and 84.38% for the same years, accompanied by kappa values ranging from 0.79 to 0.90. XGBoost showed a 53.5% growth in built-up areas from 1993 to 2024. Between 1993 and 2024, built-up areas increased by 53.5%, while vegetation increased by 2.3%, bare land decreased by 9.6%, and water bodies declined by 38.6%. Built-up areas will increase by 5.2%, vegetation by 4.8%, while bare land will decrease by 9.6%, and water bodies will decline by 3.8% from 2024 to 2039.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-026-00465-3
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving land cover change modeling with machine learning: comparative analysis of SVM and XGBoost in Lesotho Lowlands

Eskinder Gidey, Paidamwoyo Mhangara, Lerata Lerata
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Improving land cover change modeling with machine learning: comparative analysis of SVM and XGBoost in Lesotho Lowlands

Eskinder Gidey, Paidamwoyo Mhangara, Lerata Lerata
article en

Abstract

The Lowlands of Lesotho are critical for socio-economic growth, hosting significant activities and infrastructure, yet they face pressures from population growth, urbanisation, and land degradation. This study assessed the performance of two leading machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), in predicting land cover change from 1993 to 2039. The findings revealed a critical insight into model validation: while SVM consistently achieved higher quantitative accuracy (overall accuracy: 87–94%, Kappa coefficient: 0.83–0.92) compared to XGBoost (overall accuracy: 84–93%, Kappa coefficient: 0.79–0.90), qualitative assessment indicated that SVM produced an implausible spatiotemporal trend for built-up areas, exhibiting a pattern of increasing in 1993, decreasing in 2009, and increasing again in 2024, which contradicted known historical development in the Lowlands. This demonstrates that relying solely on accuracy metrics is insufficient for ensuring a robust workflow. By selecting the more plausible XGBoost results, the study provides a reliable analysis of historical land use/land cover (LULC) dynamics and a credible future prediction. Change detection results from XGBoost indicated an increase of 53.5% in built-up area between 1993 and 2024, a net gain of 2.3% in vegetation, a decrease of 9.6% in bare land, and a decline of 38.6% in water bodies. CA-Markov predicted the continuation of these observed trends between 2024 and 2039, with built-up area increasing by 5.2%, vegetation by 4.8%, bare land decreasing by 9.6%, and water declining by 3.8%. These insights are critical for supporting evidence-based and sustainable land use planning and management in Lesotho’s most vulnerable agroecological zone. SVM performed well, achieving accuracy rates of 92.7%, 94.27%, and 87.5% for the years 1993, 2009, and 2024, respectively, with kappa values ranging from 0.83 to 0.92. GBoost yielded lower accuracy rates of 90.62%, 92.71%, and 84.38% for the same years, accompanied by kappa values ranging from 0.79 to 0.90. XGBoost showed a 53.5% growth in built-up areas from 1993 to 2024. Between 1993 and 2024, built-up areas increased by 53.5%, while vegetation increased by 2.3%, bare land decreased by 9.6%, and water bodies declined by 38.6%. Built-up areas will increase by 5.2%, vegetation by 4.8%, while bare land will decrease by 9.6%, and water bodies will decline by 3.8% from 2024 to 2039.

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCHVol. 15(1)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Mekelle University (ET)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.