Mirror Visual Feedback Selectively Attenuates Crossover Fatigue in Distal Upper Limb Musculature: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Investigation Comparing Children and Adults

This investigation examined whether mirror visual feedback modulates crossover fatigue magnitude during unilateral handgrip exertion and whether efficacy demonstrates age-dependent and muscle-group-specific characteristics. Thirty-three participants stratified by developmental stage (adults: <i>n</i> = 17, 24.64 ± 5.38 years; children: <i>n</i> = 16, 11.87 ± 0.79 years) completed a randomized controlled crossover protocol incorporating three visual feedback conditions: mirror reflection of the exercised limb, occluded vision (no-mirror), and passive rest control. Participants performed unilateral dominant handgrip fatigue induction (20 × 6 s maximal voluntary isometric contractions) while bilateral force production was quantified pre-intervention and post-intervention across handgrip, elbow flexion, and elbow extension domains. Linear mixed-effects models with participant-specific random intercepts and slopes quantified Condition × Time × Limb interactions. In the non-exercised contralateral limb, linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that under the mirror condition, non-dominant handgrip force was maintained at rest-equivalent levels relative to control (+0.02 kg, 95% CI [-1.15, +1.17], <i>p</i> = 0.987, dz =+ 0.003), whereas vision occlusion induced significant crossover fatigue (-3.37 kg [-4.40, -2.35], <i>p</i> < 0.001, dz =- 1.16). All contrasts represent within-subject difference-of-differences in non-dominant limb change score (Post - Pre) extracted from the full factorial LMM via emmeans within the Limb = Non-dominant stratum pooled across age groups. The mirror versus no-mirror comparison yielded +3.38 kg [+2.43, +4.34], <i>p</i> < 0.001, dz =+ 1.26. Age-stratified analyses confirmed comparable effect magnitudes (adults: dz =+ 1.40; children: dz =+ 1.33). Muscle-group specificity emerged for handgrip but not elbow flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.068) or extension (<i>p</i> = 0.156). Age Group × Condition × Time × Limb interactions were non-significant (all <i>p</i> > 0.16), providing no evidence of age moderation within the tested developmental range. Mirror visual feedback constitutes an effective countermeasure against crossover fatigue in distal upper limb musculature. The magnitude of mirror-induced attenuation did not differ between children (aged 10-13 years) and adults within our sample, with no statistically detectable age moderation within the tested developmental range; formal equivalence testing was not conducted. Effects demonstrated anatomical selectivity, favoring hand musculature over proximal elbow musculature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030435
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mirror Visual Feedback Selectively Attenuates Crossover Fatigue in Distal Upper Limb Musculature: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Investigation Comparing Children and Adults

Vasile Emil Ursu, Aymen Ben Othman, Manel Bessifi, Vlad Adrian Geantă et al.
Life
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Mirror Visual Feedback Selectively Attenuates Crossover Fatigue in Distal Upper Limb Musculature: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Investigation Comparing Children and Adults

Vasile Emil Ursu, Aymen Ben Othman, Manel Bessifi, Vlad Adrian Geantă, Anis Chaouachi, Wissem Dhahbi, David G. Behm, Karim Chamari
article en

Abstract

This investigation examined whether mirror visual feedback modulates crossover fatigue magnitude during unilateral handgrip exertion and whether efficacy demonstrates age-dependent and muscle-group-specific characteristics. Thirty-three participants stratified by developmental stage (adults: <i>n</i> = 17, 24.64 ± 5.38 years; children: <i>n</i> = 16, 11.87 ± 0.79 years) completed a randomized controlled crossover protocol incorporating three visual feedback conditions: mirror reflection of the exercised limb, occluded vision (no-mirror), and passive rest control. Participants performed unilateral dominant handgrip fatigue induction (20 × 6 s maximal voluntary isometric contractions) while bilateral force production was quantified pre-intervention and post-intervention across handgrip, elbow flexion, and elbow extension domains. Linear mixed-effects models with participant-specific random intercepts and slopes quantified Condition × Time × Limb interactions. In the non-exercised contralateral limb, linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that under the mirror condition, non-dominant handgrip force was maintained at rest-equivalent levels relative to control (+0.02 kg, 95% CI [-1.15, +1.17], <i>p</i> = 0.987, dz =+ 0.003), whereas vision occlusion induced significant crossover fatigue (-3.37 kg [-4.40, -2.35], <i>p</i> < 0.001, dz =- 1.16). All contrasts represent within-subject difference-of-differences in non-dominant limb change score (Post - Pre) extracted from the full factorial LMM via emmeans within the Limb = Non-dominant stratum pooled across age groups. The mirror versus no-mirror comparison yielded +3.38 kg [+2.43, +4.34], <i>p</i> < 0.001, dz =+ 1.26. Age-stratified analyses confirmed comparable effect magnitudes (adults: dz =+ 1.40; children: dz =+ 1.33). Muscle-group specificity emerged for handgrip but not elbow flexion (<i>p</i> = 0.068) or extension (<i>p</i> = 0.156). Age Group × Condition × Time × Limb interactions were non-significant (all <i>p</i> > 0.16), providing no evidence of age moderation within the tested developmental range. Mirror visual feedback constitutes an effective countermeasure against crossover fatigue in distal upper limb musculature. The magnitude of mirror-induced attenuation did not differ between children (aged 10-13 years) and adults within our sample, with no statistically detectable age moderation within the tested developmental range; formal equivalence testing was not conducted. Effects demonstrated anatomical selectivity, favoring hand musculature over proximal elbow musculature.

LifeVol. 16(3)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Ministry of Education and Higher Education (QA), National Police Academy (JP), 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO), University of Pitesti (RO), Centre National de la Médecine et des Sciences des Sports (TN), University of Jendouba (TN), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO), Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad (RO), Manouba University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.