Theologies of Mind: Eriugena and Pratyabhijñā Śaivism

Abstract Though Eriugena's affinities with several Hindu traditions are clear, this article offers to my knowledge the first detailed discussion of Eriugena's theology in relation to any Indic theological school, here, the nondualist Śaiva tradition known as the Pratyabhijñā (“Recognition”) lineage. Rereading Eriugena in light of Pratyabhijñā theology helps meet an interpretive challenge in Eriugena: clearly articulating in what sense Eriugena thinks the lowest order of nature (the order of temporal‐spatial‐material bodies) is an illusory appearance confected by fallen minds, and how its being an artifact of created minds’ ignorance reconciles with its also being God's good creation. The Pratyabhijñā Śaivas’ error theory—whereby the error founding saṃsāra is one of “incomplete appearance” ( apūrṇakhyāti ), or “considering [oneself] as limited” ( apūrṇaṃmanyatā )—provides such a striking parallel to Eriugena that it helps his solution snap into clearer relief. The eschatological resumption of lower orders into their primordial causes, and of all creation into God, is not the passing out of being of any order of creatures, but only their newly being known as primordially always already resumed into the superessential unity of all things. The illusion is not the lower orders proceeding, but fallen minds’ projected sense of them as cut‐off fragments to be cognized and enjoyed for their own sake, rather than as limited manifestations of the great wholeness of things.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Theology
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.70077
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theologies of Mind: Eriugena and Pratyabhijñā Śaivism

Matthew Vale
Modern Theology
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Theologies of Mind: Eriugena and Pratyabhijñā Śaivism

Matthew Vale
article en

Abstract

Abstract Though Eriugena's affinities with several Hindu traditions are clear, this article offers to my knowledge the first detailed discussion of Eriugena's theology in relation to any Indic theological school, here, the nondualist Śaiva tradition known as the Pratyabhijñā (“Recognition”) lineage. Rereading Eriugena in light of Pratyabhijñā theology helps meet an interpretive challenge in Eriugena: clearly articulating in what sense Eriugena thinks the lowest order of nature (the order of temporal‐spatial‐material bodies) is an illusory appearance confected by fallen minds, and how its being an artifact of created minds’ ignorance reconciles with its also being God's good creation. The Pratyabhijñā Śaivas’ error theory—whereby the error founding saṃsāra is one of “incomplete appearance” ( apūrṇakhyāti ), or “considering [oneself] as limited” ( apūrṇaṃmanyatā )—provides such a striking parallel to Eriugena that it helps his solution snap into clearer relief. The eschatological resumption of lower orders into their primordial causes, and of all creation into God, is not the passing out of being of any order of creatures, but only their newly being known as primordially always already resumed into the superessential unity of all things. The illusion is not the lower orders proceeding, but fallen minds’ projected sense of them as cut‐off fragments to be cognized and enjoyed for their own sake, rather than as limited manifestations of the great wholeness of things.

Modern Theology
Boston College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.