Factors Influencing Generative AI Adoption for Knowledge Management in South Africa’s Automotive Sector

South Africa’s automotive sector is under increasing pressure to sustain competitiveness amid Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) transitions, persistent operational inefficiencies, and workforce ageing. Generative AI (GenAI) presents a potential pathway to strengthen knowledge management (KM) by supporting faster knowledge capture, synthesis, retrieval, and decision support. This study identifies the determinants of GenAI adoption for improving KM practices in South Africa’s automotive context. A quantitative, hypothesis-driven design was employed, integrating constructs from the PPOA, TEOG, and IEO frameworks to provide a consolidated adoption perspective. Survey data were collected from 142 industry participants and analysed using SPSS (correlation and multiple regression). The model demonstrated strong explanatory power (Adjusted R² = 0.624, p < 0.001). Results indicate that GenAI adoption is significantly and positively influenced by FATAA ethical principles, KM practices, GenAI tool capability, perceived enjoyment, perceived usefulness, compatibility, competition intensity, organisational size, mimetic pressure, and normative pressure (p < 0.05). In contrast, perceived ease of use and coercive pressure were not statistically significant in this context (p > 0.05). The study contributes a context-specific, integrated adoption model for GenAI-enabled KM in an under-researched setting and offers actionable implications for managers and policymakers focused on responsible, effective GenAI deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1393
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Generative AI Adoption for Knowledge Management in South Africa’s Automotive Sector

Mmatshuene Anna Segooa, Cecil Hlopego Kgoetiane, Diana Maphefo Ratsiku
Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Factors Influencing Generative AI Adoption for Knowledge Management in South Africa’s Automotive Sector

Mmatshuene Anna Segooa, Cecil Hlopego Kgoetiane, Diana Maphefo Ratsiku
article en

Abstract

South Africa’s automotive sector is under increasing pressure to sustain competitiveness amid Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) transitions, persistent operational inefficiencies, and workforce ageing. Generative AI (GenAI) presents a potential pathway to strengthen knowledge management (KM) by supporting faster knowledge capture, synthesis, retrieval, and decision support. This study identifies the determinants of GenAI adoption for improving KM practices in South Africa’s automotive context. A quantitative, hypothesis-driven design was employed, integrating constructs from the PPOA, TEOG, and IEO frameworks to provide a consolidated adoption perspective. Survey data were collected from 142 industry participants and analysed using SPSS (correlation and multiple regression). The model demonstrated strong explanatory power (Adjusted R² = 0.624, p < 0.001). Results indicate that GenAI adoption is significantly and positively influenced by FATAA ethical principles, KM practices, GenAI tool capability, perceived enjoyment, perceived usefulness, compatibility, competition intensity, organisational size, mimetic pressure, and normative pressure (p < 0.05). In contrast, perceived ease of use and coercive pressure were not statistically significant in this context (p > 0.05). The study contributes a context-specific, integrated adoption model for GenAI-enabled KM in an under-researched setting and offers actionable implications for managers and policymakers focused on responsible, effective GenAI deployment.

Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsVol. 8(1)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.