Reward processing in children with affective dysregulation

Abstract Background Affective dysregulation (AD) in children is characterized by irritability, anger, and frequent intense temper outbursts. Considerable evidence implies altered processing of frustration about missed rewards, but few studies investigated the preceding and thus potentially predictive reward anticipation and initial delivery processing in children with AD. Methods A total of 103 children aged 8–12 years (50 with AD and 53 without AD) were examined during a monetary reward anticipation task with event‐related potential (ERP) components resolving reward anticipation (cue‐CNV [Contingent Negative Variation]) and reward delivery phases (Reward Positivity and Feedback‐Related Negativity). All components were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Regression analyses also evaluated the associations between those ERP components and dimensional AD symptoms. Results Children with AD showed attenuated anticipatory reward processing compared to No‐ADs. The CNV at fronto‐central site (FCz) showed a significant group effect (No‐AD > AD, p = 0.017). Post‐hoc test showed that this group difference was stronger for the cue monetary condition (monetary cue: p = 0.007, d = 0.56, verbal cue: p = 0.901, d = 0.16), and that only the No‐AD group showed a significant difference between conditions ( p < 0.001). No significant effects were obtained for the delivery phase. Regression analysis showed that a reduced anticipatory CNV at FCz significantly explained AD symptoms, and that anger/irritability and anxiety/depressive symptoms predicted a reduced anticipatory CNV at FCz. Conclusion This neurophysiological characterization of reward anticipation and delivery in children with AD demonstrates altered neural activity in AD during anticipation of reward rather than following the delivery (or omission) of the reward itself. Our results highlight that altered reward anticipation in AD can occur outside frustration‐prone tasks or settings, and underline the important role of both anger/irritability and anxiety/depressive symptoms in the pathophysiology of AD for atypical reward anticipation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70102
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reward processing in children with affective dysregulation

M. Döpfner, N. Holz, Francisca Giller, Roessner et al.
JCPP Advances
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Reward processing in children with affective dysregulation

M. Döpfner, N. Holz, Francisca Giller, Roessner, A. Kaiser, Christine Igel, Pascal‐M. Aggensteiner, Tobias Banaschewski, Daniel Brandeis, Christian Beste, Sarah Hohmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Affective dysregulation (AD) in children is characterized by irritability, anger, and frequent intense temper outbursts. Considerable evidence implies altered processing of frustration about missed rewards, but few studies investigated the preceding and thus potentially predictive reward anticipation and initial delivery processing in children with AD. Methods A total of 103 children aged 8–12 years (50 with AD and 53 without AD) were examined during a monetary reward anticipation task with event‐related potential (ERP) components resolving reward anticipation (cue‐CNV [Contingent Negative Variation]) and reward delivery phases (Reward Positivity and Feedback‐Related Negativity). All components were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Regression analyses also evaluated the associations between those ERP components and dimensional AD symptoms. Results Children with AD showed attenuated anticipatory reward processing compared to No‐ADs. The CNV at fronto‐central site (FCz) showed a significant group effect (No‐AD > AD, p = 0.017). Post‐hoc test showed that this group difference was stronger for the cue monetary condition (monetary cue: p = 0.007, d = 0.56, verbal cue: p = 0.901, d = 0.16), and that only the No‐AD group showed a significant difference between conditions ( p < 0.001). No significant effects were obtained for the delivery phase. Regression analysis showed that a reduced anticipatory CNV at FCz significantly explained AD symptoms, and that anger/irritability and anxiety/depressive symptoms predicted a reduced anticipatory CNV at FCz. Conclusion This neurophysiological characterization of reward anticipation and delivery in children with AD demonstrates altered neural activity in AD during anticipation of reward rather than following the delivery (or omission) of the reward itself. Our results highlight that altered reward anticipation in AD can occur outside frustration‐prone tasks or settings, and underline the important role of both anger/irritability and anxiety/depressive symptoms in the pathophysiology of AD for atypical reward anticipation.

JCPP Advances
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Central Institute of Mental Health (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), German Center for Infection Research (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.