Optimal nano-silica filler concentration to optimize kinetics, rheology and bonding of self-adhesive composites

To determine how silica nanoparticle (NanoSi) content modulates polymerization kinetics, dentin bonding, and interfacial adaptation in self-adhesive flowable resin composites (SAFRCs). Five UDMA/PPGDMA/10-MDP SAFRCs containing 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 wt% NanoSi were compared to a commercial reference (Vertise Flow, VF). Real-time ATR-FTIR provided t<sub>0.5</sub>, Rp<sub>max</sub>, delay time, and DC<sub>max</sub>; viscosity was measured under controlled shear. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested at 24 h. Masson's trichrome and environmental SEM (E-SEM) assessed interfaces. Two-way MANOVA examined formulation and exposure time (20 vs 40 s) effects on kinetics; one-way ANOVA analyzed µSBS (ɑ = 0.05). Formulation and time significantly affected the multivariate kinetic response (Wilks' λ_formulation = 0.1905, p = 0.0099; Wilks' λ_time = 0.4296, p = 0.0045), with no interaction. NanoSi_2.5 polymerized fastest (Rp<sub>max</sub> 3.17 ± 0.43%·s⁻<sup>1</sup>); NanoSi_5 was slowest (1.61 ± 0.26%·s⁻<sup>1</sup>). DC<sub>max</sub> increased with filler, peaking at NanoSi_10 (78.77 ± 2.64%); extending exposure from 20 to 40 s raised DC<sub>max</sub> by 10.23 ± 2.16% without altering kinetics. All pastes were shear-thinning, with viscosity rising monotonically with NanoSi. SBS differed among materials (ANOVA F = 3.14, p = 0.02): VF was highest (8.6 ± 2.2 MPa); NanoSi_0 reached 6.0 ± 1.1 MPa (NS vs VF); NanoSi_2.5-5 clustered lower (~ 3-4 MPa) and NanoSi_7.5 reached the minimum. Trichrome and E-SEM showed thin, continuous interfaces at 0-2.5 wt% and increasing porosity/thin separations at 7.5-10 wt%. Nanosilica altered cure, flow and interfacial quality trade-offs; faster early kinetics and higher final conversion did not translate into higher SBS, emphasizing the need to optimize interfacial wetting/adaptation alongside mechanical parameters in SAFRC design. A formulation window may exist in which flow, cure, and bonding are balanced to enhance the clinical potential of self-adhesive composites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43290-5
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal nano-silica filler concentration to optimize kinetics, rheology and bonding of self-adhesive composites

António H. S. Delgado, Miguel Alves, Pedro Schwartz Kalil Pereira, Diana C. Silva
Scientific Reports
Dental materials and restorations
article

Optimal nano-silica filler concentration to optimize kinetics, rheology and bonding of self-adhesive composites

António H. S. Delgado, Miguel Alves, Pedro Schwartz Kalil Pereira, Diana C. Silva
article en

Abstract

To determine how silica nanoparticle (NanoSi) content modulates polymerization kinetics, dentin bonding, and interfacial adaptation in self-adhesive flowable resin composites (SAFRCs). Five UDMA/PPGDMA/10-MDP SAFRCs containing 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 wt% NanoSi were compared to a commercial reference (Vertise Flow, VF). Real-time ATR-FTIR provided t<sub>0.5</sub>, Rp<sub>max</sub>, delay time, and DC<sub>max</sub>; viscosity was measured under controlled shear. Shear bond strength (SBS) was tested at 24 h. Masson's trichrome and environmental SEM (E-SEM) assessed interfaces. Two-way MANOVA examined formulation and exposure time (20 vs 40 s) effects on kinetics; one-way ANOVA analyzed µSBS (ɑ = 0.05). Formulation and time significantly affected the multivariate kinetic response (Wilks' λ_formulation = 0.1905, p = 0.0099; Wilks' λ_time = 0.4296, p = 0.0045), with no interaction. NanoSi_2.5 polymerized fastest (Rp<sub>max</sub> 3.17 ± 0.43%·s⁻<sup>1</sup>); NanoSi_5 was slowest (1.61 ± 0.26%·s⁻<sup>1</sup>). DC<sub>max</sub> increased with filler, peaking at NanoSi_10 (78.77 ± 2.64%); extending exposure from 20 to 40 s raised DC<sub>max</sub> by 10.23 ± 2.16% without altering kinetics. All pastes were shear-thinning, with viscosity rising monotonically with NanoSi. SBS differed among materials (ANOVA F = 3.14, p = 0.02): VF was highest (8.6 ± 2.2 MPa); NanoSi_0 reached 6.0 ± 1.1 MPa (NS vs VF); NanoSi_2.5-5 clustered lower (~ 3-4 MPa) and NanoSi_7.5 reached the minimum. Trichrome and E-SEM showed thin, continuous interfaces at 0-2.5 wt% and increasing porosity/thin separations at 7.5-10 wt%. Nanosilica altered cure, flow and interfacial quality trade-offs; faster early kinetics and higher final conversion did not translate into higher SBS, emphasizing the need to optimize interfacial wetting/adaptation alongside mechanical parameters in SAFRC design. A formulation window may exist in which flow, cure, and bonding are balanced to enhance the clinical potential of self-adhesive composites.

Scientific Reports
University of Lisbon (PT), Escola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.