Bipartite question formation in Sm’algyax

Matrix questions in Sm’algyax (Tsimshianic; British Columbia, Alaska) are doubly marked. Wh-questions involve the fronting of a wh-expression to the clause-initial position, together with the interrogative clitic =u; polar questions are introduced by the complementizer ał—diachronically derived from negation—and additionally bear the clitic =ii. By contrast, embedded questions only exhibit a single component: wh-fronting for wh-questions and a complementizer element for polar questions. I argue that this asymmetry reflects a two-layer interrogative syntax. The polar complementizer and the null trigger for wh-movement instantiate an interrogative C[+Q] within CP, while the clitics =u and =ii instantiate an illocutionary operator SAASK within a higher Speech Act Phrase (SAP). Because SAP is restricted to main clauses, embedded questions necessarily lack interrogative clitics. This paper contributes novel empirical evidence from an underdescribed language to ongoing debates about the embeddability of speech acts. Sm’algyax shows clear evidence for an unembeddable SAP layer in the formation of canonical, information-seeking questions, supporting the view that SAP is a genuinely root-only projection (in line with Dayal 2023, pace Krifka 2014, 2023, Woods 2016).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.20160
Primary Topic
Magnetic Properties of Alloys
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bipartite question formation in Sm’algyax

Colin Stewart Brown
Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Magnetic Properties of Alloys
article

Bipartite question formation in Sm’algyax

Colin Stewart Brown
article en

Abstract

Matrix questions in Sm’algyax (Tsimshianic; British Columbia, Alaska) are doubly marked. Wh-questions involve the fronting of a wh-expression to the clause-initial position, together with the interrogative clitic =u; polar questions are introduced by the complementizer ał—diachronically derived from negation—and additionally bear the clitic =ii. By contrast, embedded questions only exhibit a single component: wh-fronting for wh-questions and a complementizer element for polar questions. I argue that this asymmetry reflects a two-layer interrogative syntax. The polar complementizer and the null trigger for wh-movement instantiate an interrogative C[+Q] within CP, while the clitics =u and =ii instantiate an illocutionary operator SAASK within a higher Speech Act Phrase (SAP). Because SAP is restricted to main clauses, embedded questions necessarily lack interrogative clitics. This paper contributes novel empirical evidence from an underdescribed language to ongoing debates about the embeddability of speech acts. Sm’algyax shows clear evidence for an unembeddable SAP layer in the formation of canonical, information-seeking questions, supporting the view that SAP is a genuinely root-only projection (in line with Dayal 2023, pace Krifka 2014, 2023, Woods 2016).

Glossa a journal of general linguisticsVol. 11(1)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Magnetic Properties of Alloys
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.