Monitoring feral pigs ( <i>Sus scrofa</i> ): Complementarity between autonomous sensing methods increases detection probability

Abstract Invasive alien species are a major threat to biodiversity, with significant impacts on threatened species and priority sites. Monitoring is essential to inform appropriate management strategies, and autonomous sensors are increasingly used to address data collection at large spatio‐temporal scales. Feral pigs ( Sus scrofa ) are a major threat to native fauna in Australia. Here, the utility of passive acoustic monitoring for detecting feral pigs and its complementarity to camera trap detection was tested. A custom‐built deep‐learning BirdNET recogniser was used to automatically scan sound for pig presence; image data was manually scanned. Detection probabilities and effects of covariates were compared for detections of each method, separately and combined, using multi‐season occupancy models. There was little spatio‐temporal overlap between image and sound detections. Modelled detection probability was the highest when sound and image detections were combined, followed by sound and, lastly, images. Seasonality affected detectability: camera traps were most successful in the Late Wet, when sound detection was poor. Sound detection was more successful in all other seasons, with the highest detection probability in the Late Dry. The intrinsic variation across survey methods along with the effects of environmental factors in species behaviour can be accounted for by combining methods, improving overall detections and providing complementary information on the same species. Autonomous sensors can provide comprehensive data to inform land management decisions, including population control and impact mitigation of invasive species. However, the utility of different sensors is context‐dependent. Combining multiple technologies can harness the strengths of each and mitigate against weaknesses. Increasing technology accessibility and decreasing costs is key to facilitate uptake by land managers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70062
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring feral pigs ( Sus scrofa ): Complementarity between autonomous sensing methods increases detection probability

Maryam Golchin, Stewart Macdonald, Jens Froese, Simon Linke et al.
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Monitoring feral pigs ( Sus scrofa ): Complementarity between autonomous sensing methods increases detection probability

Maryam Golchin, Stewart Macdonald, Jens Froese, Simon Linke, Marina D. A. Scarpelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Invasive alien species are a major threat to biodiversity, with significant impacts on threatened species and priority sites. Monitoring is essential to inform appropriate management strategies, and autonomous sensors are increasingly used to address data collection at large spatio‐temporal scales. Feral pigs ( Sus scrofa ) are a major threat to native fauna in Australia. Here, the utility of passive acoustic monitoring for detecting feral pigs and its complementarity to camera trap detection was tested. A custom‐built deep‐learning BirdNET recogniser was used to automatically scan sound for pig presence; image data was manually scanned. Detection probabilities and effects of covariates were compared for detections of each method, separately and combined, using multi‐season occupancy models. There was little spatio‐temporal overlap between image and sound detections. Modelled detection probability was the highest when sound and image detections were combined, followed by sound and, lastly, images. Seasonality affected detectability: camera traps were most successful in the Late Wet, when sound detection was poor. Sound detection was more successful in all other seasons, with the highest detection probability in the Late Dry. The intrinsic variation across survey methods along with the effects of environmental factors in species behaviour can be accounted for by combining methods, improving overall detections and providing complementary information on the same species. Autonomous sensors can provide comprehensive data to inform land management decisions, including population control and impact mitigation of invasive species. However, the utility of different sensors is context‐dependent. Combining multiple technologies can harness the strengths of each and mitigate against weaknesses. Increasing technology accessibility and decreasing costs is key to facilitate uptake by land managers.

Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU), Townsville Hospital (AU), CSIRO Health and Biosecurity (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.