Animal Welfare Monitor: Raising the Bar for Species-Specific Welfare Evaluation Using Welfare Quality® Principles

Assessing zoo animal welfare can involve generic evaluations or targeted, species-specific protocols. While the latter offer greater precision, their development is often limited by species diversity and the lack of validated indicators. The Animal Welfare Monitor<sup>®</sup> (AWM) protocol addresses these challenges by adapting Welfare Quality<sup>®</sup> principles to zoological contexts. Its core innovation is a four-level hierarchical structure (base, order, family, species) linking broad taxonomic knowledge to species-level protocols. This enables tailored questionnaires for each species, including data-deficient taxa, by leveraging information from related groups. Questionnaires, covering housing, nutrition, health, and behaviour, are complemented by behavioural observations. AWM currently covers 87 species (69 mammals, 15 birds, 2 amphibians, 1 reptile) and constitutes a substantial database of species-specific welfare assessment protocols embedded within a single, standardised methodological framework. Between 2021 and 2025, 14 zoos conducted over 1000 assessments and 15,000 behavioural observations, demonstrating the protocol's feasibility in routine operations. AWM integrates data entry with visual documentation, such as photographs of enclosures or enrichment, which add context, enhance decision-making, and strengthen long-term records. While refinements such as group-level assessment remain, AWM offers a scalable, flexible tool combining scientific rigour with operational applicability, supporting positive welfare outcomes across diverse zoological institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050842
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Animal Welfare Monitor: Raising the Bar for Species-Specific Welfare Evaluation Using Welfare Quality® Principles

Marine Parker, Benoît Quintard, Alexandre Torres Petry, Baptiste Chenet et al.
Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Animal Welfare Monitor: Raising the Bar for Species-Specific Welfare Evaluation Using Welfare Quality® Principles

Marine Parker, Benoît Quintard, Alexandre Torres Petry, Baptiste Chenet, Amélie Romain, Léa Briard, Gwenaël Leroutier, Constance Wagner
article en

Abstract

Assessing zoo animal welfare can involve generic evaluations or targeted, species-specific protocols. While the latter offer greater precision, their development is often limited by species diversity and the lack of validated indicators. The Animal Welfare Monitor<sup>®</sup> (AWM) protocol addresses these challenges by adapting Welfare Quality<sup>®</sup> principles to zoological contexts. Its core innovation is a four-level hierarchical structure (base, order, family, species) linking broad taxonomic knowledge to species-level protocols. This enables tailored questionnaires for each species, including data-deficient taxa, by leveraging information from related groups. Questionnaires, covering housing, nutrition, health, and behaviour, are complemented by behavioural observations. AWM currently covers 87 species (69 mammals, 15 birds, 2 amphibians, 1 reptile) and constitutes a substantial database of species-specific welfare assessment protocols embedded within a single, standardised methodological framework. Between 2021 and 2025, 14 zoos conducted over 1000 assessments and 15,000 behavioural observations, demonstrating the protocol's feasibility in routine operations. AWM integrates data entry with visual documentation, such as photographs of enclosures or enrichment, which add context, enhance decision-making, and strengthen long-term records. While refinements such as group-level assessment remain, AWM offers a scalable, flexible tool combining scientific rigour with operational applicability, supporting positive welfare outcomes across diverse zoological institutions.

AnimalsVol. 16(5)
Australian Bureau of Statistics (AU), Agropolis International (FR), Département Santé Animale (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.