The Conflicting Consequences of Afghanistan's Membership in SAARC (2007–2021): A Critical Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges

This study examines the conflicting consequences of Afghanistan's membership in SAARC. The main research question is what opportunities Afghanistan's membership in SAARC has provided for the country's political, economic, and cultural development during the years 2007-2021 and what challenges it has created. The theoretical framework of the study is based on the theory of liberal institutionalism, and the research method is descriptive-analytical, relying on documentary data and structural analysis of regional relations. The findings show that Afghanistan's membership in SAARC has, on the one hand, promoted regional legitimacy, expanded multilateral diplomacy, and increased cultural and educational cooperation. On the other hand, geopolitical competition between India and Pakistan, the development gap between members, and the weakness of Afghanistan's internal economic structure have prevented the realization of sustainable development. In the economic sphere, convergence has been formed asymmetrically, and Afghanistan has become a regional consumer market rather than benefiting from export benefits. On the other hand, cultural and educational cooperation is considered one of the most sustainable achievements of membership. The study concludes that Afghanistan’s membership in SAARC has a dual and conflicting nature and that the realization of its interests depends on domestic capacity, political stability, and intelligent management of regional relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i3.7448
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Conflicting Consequences of Afghanistan's Membership in SAARC (2007–2021): A Critical Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges

Mohammad Musa Sadeqi
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

The Conflicting Consequences of Afghanistan's Membership in SAARC (2007–2021): A Critical Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges

Mohammad Musa Sadeqi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the conflicting consequences of Afghanistan's membership in SAARC. The main research question is what opportunities Afghanistan's membership in SAARC has provided for the country's political, economic, and cultural development during the years 2007-2021 and what challenges it has created. The theoretical framework of the study is based on the theory of liberal institutionalism, and the research method is descriptive-analytical, relying on documentary data and structural analysis of regional relations. The findings show that Afghanistan's membership in SAARC has, on the one hand, promoted regional legitimacy, expanded multilateral diplomacy, and increased cultural and educational cooperation. On the other hand, geopolitical competition between India and Pakistan, the development gap between members, and the weakness of Afghanistan's internal economic structure have prevented the realization of sustainable development. In the economic sphere, convergence has been formed asymmetrically, and Afghanistan has become a regional consumer market rather than benefiting from export benefits. On the other hand, cultural and educational cooperation is considered one of the most sustainable achievements of membership. The study concludes that Afghanistan’s membership in SAARC has a dual and conflicting nature and that the realization of its interests depends on domestic capacity, political stability, and intelligent management of regional relations.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious UnderstandingVol. 13(3)
University of International Relations (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.