Design and evaluation of four low-cost engineering controls for reducing particle emissions from 3D printing
Multiple studies indicate that workers are being exposed to emissions from material extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing processes and suffering adverse health effects from the exposures. To mitigate these exposures, we developed and evaluated four low-cost engineering controls to capture particle emissions during 3D printing processes. Two controls (Controls A and B) were custom developed using 3D printed parts and retrofitted onto the extruder of two open-frame desktop fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers (Printers 1 and 2) to capture emissions near the source. A third control (Control C) used a commercially available, printer-specific enclosure that partially encapsulated Printer 2, while a fourth control (Control D) was built using acrylic panels to fully enclose Printer 2. Particle emissions from each control were exhausted through NIOSH-designed air filtration units consisting of a high-efficiency filter, blower fan, and 3D printed housing/components. Control effectiveness was evaluated in an emissions test chamber by comparing average particle concentrations at the chamber outlet while 3D-printing a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test artifact with black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene filament, with and without the controls in operation. Minimum capture efficiencies were 99.7% for Control A, 91.6% for Control B, 28.6% for Control C, and 99.8% for Control D. Internal cooling fans in Printer 2 allowed particle emissions to bypass Control C, limiting its effectiveness. Overall, capturing emissions at the source (Controls A and B) and full enclosure (Control D) were highly effective and demonstrated that low-cost engineering controls can mitigate particle emissions from 3D printing processes. • Low-cost controls can reduce emissions from desktop 3D printers • Custom 3D-printed nozzles reduced particle emissions by over 90% • Enclosing printers with HEPA filtration reduced emissions by 99.8% • Poorly designed enclosures allowed particles to bypass the filter • Emission capture at the source is critical for effective control
Authors
- Duane Hammond
- Kevin Dunn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-7832)
- Christopher M. Barnes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-6200)
- By Colleen O’Connor
Institutions
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Atmospheric Environment X
- Published
- 2026-03-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100432
- Primary Topic
- Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00