Design and evaluation of four low-cost engineering controls for reducing particle emissions from 3D printing

Multiple studies indicate that workers are being exposed to emissions from material extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing processes and suffering adverse health effects from the exposures. To mitigate these exposures, we developed and evaluated four low-cost engineering controls to capture particle emissions during 3D printing processes. Two controls (Controls A and B) were custom developed using 3D printed parts and retrofitted onto the extruder of two open-frame desktop fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers (Printers 1 and 2) to capture emissions near the source. A third control (Control C) used a commercially available, printer-specific enclosure that partially encapsulated Printer 2, while a fourth control (Control D) was built using acrylic panels to fully enclose Printer 2. Particle emissions from each control were exhausted through NIOSH-designed air filtration units consisting of a high-efficiency filter, blower fan, and 3D printed housing/components. Control effectiveness was evaluated in an emissions test chamber by comparing average particle concentrations at the chamber outlet while 3D-printing a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test artifact with black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene filament, with and without the controls in operation. Minimum capture efficiencies were 99.7% for Control A, 91.6% for Control B, 28.6% for Control C, and 99.8% for Control D. Internal cooling fans in Printer 2 allowed particle emissions to bypass Control C, limiting its effectiveness. Overall, capturing emissions at the source (Controls A and B) and full enclosure (Control D) were highly effective and demonstrated that low-cost engineering controls can mitigate particle emissions from 3D printing processes. • Low-cost controls can reduce emissions from desktop 3D printers • Custom 3D-printed nozzles reduced particle emissions by over 90% • Enclosing printers with HEPA filtration reduced emissions by 99.8% • Poorly designed enclosures allowed particles to bypass the filter • Emission capture at the source is critical for effective control

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Environment X
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100432
Primary Topic
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and evaluation of four low-cost engineering controls for reducing particle emissions from 3D printing

Duane Hammond, Kevin Dunn, Christopher M. Barnes, By Colleen O’Connor
Atmospheric Environment X
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
article

Design and evaluation of four low-cost engineering controls for reducing particle emissions from 3D printing

Duane Hammond, Kevin Dunn, Christopher M. Barnes, By Colleen O’Connor
article en

Abstract

Multiple studies indicate that workers are being exposed to emissions from material extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing processes and suffering adverse health effects from the exposures. To mitigate these exposures, we developed and evaluated four low-cost engineering controls to capture particle emissions during 3D printing processes. Two controls (Controls A and B) were custom developed using 3D printed parts and retrofitted onto the extruder of two open-frame desktop fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers (Printers 1 and 2) to capture emissions near the source. A third control (Control C) used a commercially available, printer-specific enclosure that partially encapsulated Printer 2, while a fourth control (Control D) was built using acrylic panels to fully enclose Printer 2. Particle emissions from each control were exhausted through NIOSH-designed air filtration units consisting of a high-efficiency filter, blower fan, and 3D printed housing/components. Control effectiveness was evaluated in an emissions test chamber by comparing average particle concentrations at the chamber outlet while 3D-printing a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) test artifact with black acrylonitrile butadiene styrene filament, with and without the controls in operation. Minimum capture efficiencies were 99.7% for Control A, 91.6% for Control B, 28.6% for Control C, and 99.8% for Control D. Internal cooling fans in Printer 2 allowed particle emissions to bypass Control C, limiting its effectiveness. Overall, capturing emissions at the source (Controls A and B) and full enclosure (Control D) were highly effective and demonstrated that low-cost engineering controls can mitigate particle emissions from 3D printing processes. • Low-cost controls can reduce emissions from desktop 3D printers • Custom 3D-printed nozzles reduced particle emissions by over 90% • Enclosing printers with HEPA filtration reduced emissions by 99.8% • Poorly designed enclosures allowed particles to bypass the filter • Emission capture at the source is critical for effective control

Atmospheric Environment XVol. 30
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.