Finite element analysis of the pedicle screw in lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization that penetrates the lateral cortex of the vertebral pedicle

The mechanical stability of lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization (LTDS) was determined by simulating the degree to which the pedicle screws penetrated the lateral pedicle cortex. A finite element model of the L4-5 segment was established. Four states of pedicle screw implantation were simulated: in Type 1, the pedicle screw was located entirely within the pedicle; in Types 2, 3, and 4, the pedicle screw broke through the lateral pedicle cortex by ≤ 2 mm, 2.1–4 mm, and > 4 mm, respectively. The L4-5 segment was fixed with LTDS with seven pedicle screw fixation models: Groups A (all screws: Type 1), B (left screws: Type 2; right screws: Type 1), C (left screws: Type 3; right screws: Type 1), D (left screws: Type 4; right screws: Type 1), E (all screws: Type 2), F (all screws: Type 3) and G (all screws: Type 4). The corresponding mechanical indicators were recorded. Among Groups A, B, C and D, Group B had the smallest overall displacement and overall strain, followed by Groups A, B, C, and D; the overall stress and pedicle screw stress of Group D were the lowest, followed by Groups C, B, and A; and there were no significant differences in overall displacement or pedicle screw stress among the groups (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in overall strain and overall stress among the groups (all p < 0.001). Among Groups A, E, F and G, the overall displacement and overall strain of Group E were the lowest, followed by Groups A, F, and G; the overall stress and pedicle screw stress of Group G were the lowest, followed by Groups F, A, and E; and there was no significant difference in overall displacement within the groups (p = 0.718). However, there were significant differences in overall strain, overall stress, and pedicle screw stress among the groups (all P < 0.001). Within the limits of the present model, it may be acceptable for the screw to be located within the pedicle and for the screw to penetrate past the lateral pedicle cortex by ≤ 2 mm. The mechanical strength of the pedicle screws decreases progressively when they penetrate past the lateral pedicle cortex by 2.1–4 mm and > 4 mm, so such penetration and should be avoided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09701-4
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite element analysis of the pedicle screw in lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization that penetrates the lateral cortex of the vertebral pedicle

Meichao Zhang, Pei Li, Lei Luo, Chen Zhao et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Finite element analysis of the pedicle screw in lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization that penetrates the lateral cortex of the vertebral pedicle

Meichao Zhang, Pei Li, Lei Luo, Chen Zhao, Qiang Zhou, Liehua Liu
article en

Abstract

The mechanical stability of lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization (LTDS) was determined by simulating the degree to which the pedicle screws penetrated the lateral pedicle cortex. A finite element model of the L4-5 segment was established. Four states of pedicle screw implantation were simulated: in Type 1, the pedicle screw was located entirely within the pedicle; in Types 2, 3, and 4, the pedicle screw broke through the lateral pedicle cortex by ≤ 2 mm, 2.1–4 mm, and > 4 mm, respectively. The L4-5 segment was fixed with LTDS with seven pedicle screw fixation models: Groups A (all screws: Type 1), B (left screws: Type 2; right screws: Type 1), C (left screws: Type 3; right screws: Type 1), D (left screws: Type 4; right screws: Type 1), E (all screws: Type 2), F (all screws: Type 3) and G (all screws: Type 4). The corresponding mechanical indicators were recorded. Among Groups A, B, C and D, Group B had the smallest overall displacement and overall strain, followed by Groups A, B, C, and D; the overall stress and pedicle screw stress of Group D were the lowest, followed by Groups C, B, and A; and there were no significant differences in overall displacement or pedicle screw stress among the groups (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in overall strain and overall stress among the groups (all p < 0.001). Among Groups A, E, F and G, the overall displacement and overall strain of Group E were the lowest, followed by Groups A, F, and G; the overall stress and pedicle screw stress of Group G were the lowest, followed by Groups F, A, and E; and there was no significant difference in overall displacement within the groups (p = 0.718). However, there were significant differences in overall strain, overall stress, and pedicle screw stress among the groups (all P < 0.001). Within the limits of the present model, it may be acceptable for the screw to be located within the pedicle and for the screw to penetrate past the lateral pedicle cortex by ≤ 2 mm. The mechanical strength of the pedicle screws decreases progressively when they penetrate past the lateral pedicle cortex by 2.1–4 mm and > 4 mm, so such penetration and should be avoided.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Southern Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.