Perceived Saturation in Normal and Red–Green Color‐Deficient Observers

ABSTRACT To directly compare the strength of perceived saturation between color‐normal observers (CNOs) and congenital red–green color‐deficient observers (CDOs), the perceived saturation differences of 11 test pairs were evaluated by CNOs, protans, and deutans using a grayscale method. Three experiments were conducted. First, the commonality of lightness‐difference evaluation on the grayscale was examined. Results for three color vision types were nearly identical, indicating the effectiveness of the method. Second, to individually prepare equal‐brightness stimuli for each of the four hue series (Red, Green, Yellow, and Blue), a brightness‐matching experiment was conducted. CDOs showed the Helmholtz–Kohlrausch effect similar to CNOs, except for the Red series, where the effect was weaker than CNOs. Third, the perceived saturation difference of the test pair with different chroma but nearly the same hue and brightness was evaluated. It increased with the Δ E 00 of the test pair similarly in all hues in individual observers and thus fitted by a linear equation. The mean slopes for CNOs, protans, and deutans were 1.01, 0.79, and 0.60, respectively, reflecting the relative strength of perceived saturation difference. On the other hand, the group data showed hue dependency that the decrease of perceived saturation difference relative to CNOs was larger in Red and Green than Yellow and Blue, indicating greater reduction in the red‐green mechanism than the yellow‐blue. No significant difference was found between protans and deutans, or between dichromats and anomalous trichromats in this study, but that requires further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Color Research & Application
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/col.70065
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Saturation in Normal and Red–Green Color‐Deficient Observers

Tomoharu Ishikawa, Kota Kanari, Miyoshi Ayama
Color Research & Application
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Perceived Saturation in Normal and Red–Green Color‐Deficient Observers

Tomoharu Ishikawa, Kota Kanari, Miyoshi Ayama
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT To directly compare the strength of perceived saturation between color‐normal observers (CNOs) and congenital red–green color‐deficient observers (CDOs), the perceived saturation differences of 11 test pairs were evaluated by CNOs, protans, and deutans using a grayscale method. Three experiments were conducted. First, the commonality of lightness‐difference evaluation on the grayscale was examined. Results for three color vision types were nearly identical, indicating the effectiveness of the method. Second, to individually prepare equal‐brightness stimuli for each of the four hue series (Red, Green, Yellow, and Blue), a brightness‐matching experiment was conducted. CDOs showed the Helmholtz–Kohlrausch effect similar to CNOs, except for the Red series, where the effect was weaker than CNOs. Third, the perceived saturation difference of the test pair with different chroma but nearly the same hue and brightness was evaluated. It increased with the Δ E 00 of the test pair similarly in all hues in individual observers and thus fitted by a linear equation. The mean slopes for CNOs, protans, and deutans were 1.01, 0.79, and 0.60, respectively, reflecting the relative strength of perceived saturation difference. On the other hand, the group data showed hue dependency that the decrease of perceived saturation difference relative to CNOs was larger in Red and Green than Yellow and Blue, indicating greater reduction in the red‐green mechanism than the yellow‐blue. No significant difference was found between protans and deutans, or between dichromats and anomalous trichromats in this study, but that requires further investigation.

Color Research & ApplicationVol. 51(2)
Utsunomiya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.