Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy

Brief and accurate tools are needed to enhance the prompt identification of cognitive disorders. This study aimed to translate and adapt two recently developed, highly accurate instruments into Italian: the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC) and the BASIC Questionnaire (BASIC-Q), and to validate their diagnostic accuracy. The Italian versions of BASIC and BASIC-Q were developed following a rigorous process and were validated in patient populations referred to two Italian tertiary memory clinics. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative validity of BASIC and BASIC-Q in identifying cognitive impairment compared to specialist diagnoses. Linear regression models were used to explore the influence of traditional confounders, such as age and education. A total of 246 participants were recruited for the study. The BASIC and BASIC-Q assessments accurately distinguished between individuals with cognitive impairment and those with intact cognition, achieving areas under the curve of 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. The accuracy of these two tools was comparable to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Additionally, both instruments showed a negative association with age but were not influenced by educational level. The BASIC and BASIC-Q tools effectively identify older individuals with cognitive impairment who may need further diagnostic assessment. Their accuracy must be explored in primary care settings and among multicultural populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurological Sciences
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08691-w
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy

Daniel Kjærgaard, Emanuela Salati, Giulia Sarti, Ilaria Cova et al.
Neurological Sciences
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Validation of the brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) and brief assessment of impaired cognition questionnaire (BASIC-Q) in Italy

Daniel Kjærgaard, Emanuela Salati, Giulia Sarti, Ilaria Cova, Marco Toccaceli Blasi, Chiara Pecorari, Filippo Nuti, Clara Calia, Simone Pomati, T. Rune Nielsen, Sara Marchetti, Giuseppe Eugenio Bruno, Giorgia Maestri, Kasper Jørgensen, Marco Canevelli, Francesco Sciancalepore, Leonardo Pantoni, Nicola Vanacore
article en

Abstract

Brief and accurate tools are needed to enhance the prompt identification of cognitive disorders. This study aimed to translate and adapt two recently developed, highly accurate instruments into Italian: the Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC) and the BASIC Questionnaire (BASIC-Q), and to validate their diagnostic accuracy. The Italian versions of BASIC and BASIC-Q were developed following a rigorous process and were validated in patient populations referred to two Italian tertiary memory clinics. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative validity of BASIC and BASIC-Q in identifying cognitive impairment compared to specialist diagnoses. Linear regression models were used to explore the influence of traditional confounders, such as age and education. A total of 246 participants were recruited for the study. The BASIC and BASIC-Q assessments accurately distinguished between individuals with cognitive impairment and those with intact cognition, achieving areas under the curve of 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. The accuracy of these two tools was comparable to that of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Additionally, both instruments showed a negative association with age but were not influenced by educational level. The BASIC and BASIC-Q tools effectively identify older individuals with cognitive impairment who may need further diagnostic assessment. Their accuracy must be explored in primary care settings and among multicultural populations.

Neurological SciencesVol. 47(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Milan (IT), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Luigi Sacco Hospital (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (IT), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Casa di Cura Columbus (IT), National Institute of Health (AM), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Velux Fonden
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.