Ties That Lift and Bind: How Relationships Empower and Disempower Careers

In this research study we take a linked lives perspective and apply interdependence theory to explore how meaningful relationships impact individual career decisions over the life course. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 31 participants and analyzed the data in a thematic analysis procedure, taking a mixed approach where data was openly coded, a subset identified and isolated, classified into categories, and openly coded again. Our findings not only demonstrate how desirable and overall positive relationships can be empower individuals' careers (supporting, mentoring), but how they can also limit and disempower them (constraining, distracting). This study reopens a discussion on the role of relationships in careers, acknowledging the positive and negative aspects they may have, thus complementing the agentic perspective that is currently dominant in career theory. We provide empiric support to ideas that are often used in career counseling, identifying the individual's unique set of relationships and the impact they have.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030385
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ties That Lift and Bind: How Relationships Empower and Disempower Careers

Maria Mouratidou, Galina Boiarintseva, Hina Kalyal, Mirit K. Grabarski
Behavioral Sciences
Career Development and Diversity
article

Ties That Lift and Bind: How Relationships Empower and Disempower Careers

Maria Mouratidou, Galina Boiarintseva, Hina Kalyal, Mirit K. Grabarski
article en

Abstract

In this research study we take a linked lives perspective and apply interdependence theory to explore how meaningful relationships impact individual career decisions over the life course. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 31 participants and analyzed the data in a thematic analysis procedure, taking a mixed approach where data was openly coded, a subset identified and isolated, classified into categories, and openly coded again. Our findings not only demonstrate how desirable and overall positive relationships can be empower individuals' careers (supporting, mentoring), but how they can also limit and disempower them (constraining, distracting). This study reopens a discussion on the role of relationships in careers, acknowledging the positive and negative aspects they may have, thus complementing the agentic perspective that is currently dominant in career theory. We provide empiric support to ideas that are often used in career counseling, identifying the individual's unique set of relationships and the impact they have.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(3)
University of Regina (CA), Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (CA), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Lakehead University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.