Leibniz, the problem of regret, and the problem of the essentially damned

Abstract The problem of regret is the problem of reconciling the perfect bliss of the blessed in heaven with their desire or wish that things had somehow gone better for the damned. Leibniz’s superessentialism, according to which every event that occurs in the life of a person is essential to that person, provides a unique and robust solution to this problem. But it also entails that those who are damned are essentially damned. What could possibly justify God’s decision to create such persons? In this paper, I argue that Leibniz’s larger metaphysical system has the resources to provide a unique and robust solution to this problem as well.