The Importance of Spatial Variability in Estimating Evapotranspiration From a Subalpine Wetland

ABSTRACT The Canadian Rocky Mountains are a critical component to the hydrology, feeding water to many rivers. However, little is still known about the magnitude of hydrological processes (i.e., evapotranspiration (ET), discharge etc.) that comprise the alpine and subalpine hydrologic cycle. Sub‐alpine wetlands have received recent attention for their potential role as water retainers and sources for downstream systems. This purpose of this study was to quantify the ecohydrological controls on ET in a sub‐alpine wetland, using closed chamber measurements. Spatial patterns in evapotranspiration were modelled using the METRIC approach with data collected via a remote aerial vehicle (RAV). Closed chamber measurements for ET were taken in August, 2021, and the results indicated that vapour pressure deficit and net radiation were the significant controls on ET, while no significant influence was seen in vegetation type. The influence of the headwall was also clear as there were significant differences in ET between sunny (avg rate 0.14 ± 0.1 mm/h) and shady (avg rate 0.06 ± 0.4 mm/h) conditions. METRIC ET demonstrated considerable spatial variability, with higher rates located in the western portion of the field site, highlighting the complexity of quantifying ET in subalpine wetlands. When validated against the closed chamber data, METRIC ET captured the general range of ET measurements reasonably well, and had a modelled root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.07 mm/h. However, we recommend that future research test METRIC performance under different seasonal conditions to better quantify the model's capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70451
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Spatial Variability in Estimating Evapotranspiration From a Subalpine Wetland

Richard Michael Petrone, Brandon Van Huizen, Sheryl H. M. Chau
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

The Importance of Spatial Variability in Estimating Evapotranspiration From a Subalpine Wetland

Richard Michael Petrone, Brandon Van Huizen, Sheryl H. M. Chau
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Canadian Rocky Mountains are a critical component to the hydrology, feeding water to many rivers. However, little is still known about the magnitude of hydrological processes (i.e., evapotranspiration (ET), discharge etc.) that comprise the alpine and subalpine hydrologic cycle. Sub‐alpine wetlands have received recent attention for their potential role as water retainers and sources for downstream systems. This purpose of this study was to quantify the ecohydrological controls on ET in a sub‐alpine wetland, using closed chamber measurements. Spatial patterns in evapotranspiration were modelled using the METRIC approach with data collected via a remote aerial vehicle (RAV). Closed chamber measurements for ET were taken in August, 2021, and the results indicated that vapour pressure deficit and net radiation were the significant controls on ET, while no significant influence was seen in vegetation type. The influence of the headwall was also clear as there were significant differences in ET between sunny (avg rate 0.14 ± 0.1 mm/h) and shady (avg rate 0.06 ± 0.4 mm/h) conditions. METRIC ET demonstrated considerable spatial variability, with higher rates located in the western portion of the field site, highlighting the complexity of quantifying ET in subalpine wetlands. When validated against the closed chamber data, METRIC ET captured the general range of ET measurements reasonably well, and had a modelled root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.07 mm/h. However, we recommend that future research test METRIC performance under different seasonal conditions to better quantify the model's capabilities.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 40(3)
University of Waterloo (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.