Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development

Despite recent advancements in oncology drug development, patient access to innovative cancer therapies remains inadequate. There is an urgent need for more patient-centric approaches, with meaningful patient input from trial design through to health technology assessment (HTA) consultation. Multi-stakeholder consensus calls for better representation of the diversity of the target population and integration of patients' preferences in clinical cancer research by systematically collecting patient-reported outcomes using standardized methods, and acknowledging trade-offs between survival and long-term wellbeing. Furthermore, the generation of insufficiently robust data for regulatory and HTA decision-making continue to delay patient access to innovation. This could be mitigated through smarter study designs, including smaller, fit-for-purpose randomized studies and prospectively designed trials. Finally, concerted efforts are required to develop and validate novel intermediate/surrogate endpoints that enable earlier assessment of treatment outcomes to facilitate timely, evidence-based decisions that improve the patient experience across the cancer care continuum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-026-00936-w
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development

P D A Zapella, Anja E. Schiel, Axel Glasmacher, Fergus Sweeney et al.
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Challenges and Potential Solutions to Advance Global Cancer Drug Development

P D A Zapella, Anja E. Schiel, Axel Glasmacher, Fergus Sweeney, Carin A. Uyl‐de Groot, Bruno Paiva, Murielle Mauer, Birgit Wolf, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal, Lidia Zielińska, Emma Clark, Jaap Verweij, Kim Lyerly
article en

Abstract

Despite recent advancements in oncology drug development, patient access to innovative cancer therapies remains inadequate. There is an urgent need for more patient-centric approaches, with meaningful patient input from trial design through to health technology assessment (HTA) consultation. Multi-stakeholder consensus calls for better representation of the diversity of the target population and integration of patients' preferences in clinical cancer research by systematically collecting patient-reported outcomes using standardized methods, and acknowledging trade-offs between survival and long-term wellbeing. Furthermore, the generation of insufficiently robust data for regulatory and HTA decision-making continue to delay patient access to innovation. This could be mitigated through smarter study designs, including smaller, fit-for-purpose randomized studies and prospectively designed trials. Finally, concerted efforts are required to develop and validate novel intermediate/surrogate endpoints that enable earlier assessment of treatment outcomes to facilitate timely, evidence-based decisions that improve the patient experience across the cancer care continuum.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
University of Bonn (DE), Duke University (US), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Erasmus MC (NL), Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (NO), Debiopharm (Switzerland) (CH), Roche (United Kingdom) (GB), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (BE), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), The Patients Association (GB), Bayer (Germany) (DE), Asahi Glass (Belgium) (BE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.