Role of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent among patients with cardiovascular disease and is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for OSA, but its impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain, particularly in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objectives: To evaluate the effect of CPAP therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with OSA, and to explore the influence of adherence on treatment efficacy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing CPAP with placebo or usual care in adults with OSA. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and CINAHL were searched from inception to December 2024. Primary outcome was MACE; secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, heart failure, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses were performed based on CPAP adherence (≥4 hours/night vs/night). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using fixed-effects model. Results: Eleven RCTs comprising 6,139 participants were included. Overall, CPAP did not significantly reduce MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.87–1.14) or secondary cardiovascular outcomes. However, in patients adherent to CPAP (≥4 hours/night), MACE was significantly reduced (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52–0.97), and cardiovascular mortality decreased (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14–0.91). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant benefits in non-adherent patients. Heterogeneity was low for most outcomes. Conclusion: CPAP therapy does not significantly reduce overall cardiovascular risk in OSA patients, except among adherent individuals. These findings underscore adherence as a critical determinant of CPAP’s cardiovascular efficacy. Future trials should prioritize strategies to optimize adherence to fully evaluate CPAP’s cardioprotective potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1479
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Maryam Altaher, Rayan Aljubeh, Sami Alsalem, Ahmad Alilo et al.
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Role of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Maryam Altaher, Rayan Aljubeh, Sami Alsalem, Ahmad Alilo, Saif Almuzainy, Mohamed Lemine, Mohamed Dawdi, Mohamed Almuzainy
article en

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent among patients with cardiovascular disease and is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for OSA, but its impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain, particularly in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objectives: To evaluate the effect of CPAP therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with OSA, and to explore the influence of adherence on treatment efficacy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing CPAP with placebo or usual care in adults with OSA. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and CINAHL were searched from inception to December 2024. Primary outcome was MACE; secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, heart failure, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses were performed based on CPAP adherence (≥4 hours/night vs/night). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using fixed-effects model. Results: Eleven RCTs comprising 6,139 participants were included. Overall, CPAP did not significantly reduce MACE (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.87–1.14) or secondary cardiovascular outcomes. However, in patients adherent to CPAP (≥4 hours/night), MACE was significantly reduced (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52–0.97), and cardiovascular mortality decreased (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14–0.91). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant benefits in non-adherent patients. Heterogeneity was low for most outcomes. Conclusion: CPAP therapy does not significantly reduce overall cardiovascular risk in OSA patients, except among adherent individuals. These findings underscore adherence as a critical determinant of CPAP’s cardiovascular efficacy. Future trials should prioritize strategies to optimize adherence to fully evaluate CPAP’s cardioprotective potential.

Journal of the Saudi Heart AssociationVol. 38(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.