Information Gaps and Practical Barriers in the Recommendation of Cosmetic Products by Dermatologists: Evidence From a Brazilian Study

ABSTRACT Background The recommendation of cosmetic products in dermatological practice has become increasingly common, driven by the evolution of formulations and active ingredients that sometimes mirror pharmacological effects. This convergence has blurred the boundaries between cosmetics and medications, creating uncertainty among professionals regarding product efficacy and classification. Additionally, dermatologists face challenges interpreting label information, which is often technical, fragmented, or lacks standardization, undermining clarity and clinical confidence. Objective This study aimed to evaluate dermatologists' understanding of the labeling information on cosmetic products they prescribe or recommend. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 118 Brazilian dermatologists using a 29‐question instrument (multiple‐choice, open‐ended, and scaled formats). Descriptive analysis was performed using specific statistical software 1 . Results Most participants regularly prescribe cosmetics or dermocosmetics and value labeling information. However, they report difficulties interpreting data and defining terms such as “claim” and “natural product.” Industry communication, particularly via medical detailing (industry representatives) and congresses, strongly influences prescribing decisions. There is a clear demand for objective information on composition, active concentration, safe use, and scientific evidence of efficacy. Conclusion Participants suggested improving communication between the cosmetics industry and dermatologists by providing clear, standardized information on ingredients, concentrations, usage guidelines, efficacy, adverse effects, and safety during pregnancy. These findings reinforce the need for tools that support informed clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatological Reviews
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/der2.70059
Primary Topic
Skin Protection and Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information Gaps and Practical Barriers in the Recommendation of Cosmetic Products by Dermatologists: Evidence From a Brazilian Study

Cristina Wöhlke Vendruscolo, Gislaine Ricci Leonardi, Edileia Bagatin
Dermatological Reviews
Skin Protection and Aging
article

Information Gaps and Practical Barriers in the Recommendation of Cosmetic Products by Dermatologists: Evidence From a Brazilian Study

Cristina Wöhlke Vendruscolo, Gislaine Ricci Leonardi, Edileia Bagatin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The recommendation of cosmetic products in dermatological practice has become increasingly common, driven by the evolution of formulations and active ingredients that sometimes mirror pharmacological effects. This convergence has blurred the boundaries between cosmetics and medications, creating uncertainty among professionals regarding product efficacy and classification. Additionally, dermatologists face challenges interpreting label information, which is often technical, fragmented, or lacks standardization, undermining clarity and clinical confidence. Objective This study aimed to evaluate dermatologists' understanding of the labeling information on cosmetic products they prescribe or recommend. Methods Structured interviews were conducted with 118 Brazilian dermatologists using a 29‐question instrument (multiple‐choice, open‐ended, and scaled formats). Descriptive analysis was performed using specific statistical software 1 . Results Most participants regularly prescribe cosmetics or dermocosmetics and value labeling information. However, they report difficulties interpreting data and defining terms such as “claim” and “natural product.” Industry communication, particularly via medical detailing (industry representatives) and congresses, strongly influences prescribing decisions. There is a clear demand for objective information on composition, active concentration, safe use, and scientific evidence of efficacy. Conclusion Participants suggested improving communication between the cosmetics industry and dermatologists by providing clear, standardized information on ingredients, concentrations, usage guidelines, efficacy, adverse effects, and safety during pregnancy. These findings reinforce the need for tools that support informed clinical practice.

Dermatological ReviewsVol. 7(2)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Skin Protection and Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.