Consequences of Individual‐, Organizational‐, and Societal‐Level Allyship: An Integrative Review and Recommendations for Policymakers and Practitioners

ABSTRACT Although allyship has the potential to foster inclusivity and bring about social change, its consequences have received too little attention in the literature. In the current contribution, we aim to review the allyship literature by focusing on the consequences of (1) individual‐, (2) organizational‐, and (3) societal‐level allyship. We also aim to differentiate these consequences based on whether they are perceived or labeled as positive (e.g., constructive or productive) or negative (e.g., destructive or counterproductive). By synthesizing existing interdisciplinary findings on the consequences of allyship, we provide an integrative review that highlights both its positive and negative consequences at three levels, as well as their potential targets (i.e., individual group members, organizations, and societies). We conclude the article by providing actionable recommendations for both researchers seeking to advance allyship literature, and policymakers and practitioners in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Issues and Policy Review
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.70005
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consequences of Individual‐, Organizational‐, and Societal‐Level Allyship: An Integrative Review and Recommendations for Policymakers and Practitioners

Julia A. Schreiber, Yue Ting Woo, Özden Melis Uluğ
Social Issues and Policy Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Consequences of Individual‐, Organizational‐, and Societal‐Level Allyship: An Integrative Review and Recommendations for Policymakers and Practitioners

Julia A. Schreiber, Yue Ting Woo, Özden Melis Uluğ
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although allyship has the potential to foster inclusivity and bring about social change, its consequences have received too little attention in the literature. In the current contribution, we aim to review the allyship literature by focusing on the consequences of (1) individual‐, (2) organizational‐, and (3) societal‐level allyship. We also aim to differentiate these consequences based on whether they are perceived or labeled as positive (e.g., constructive or productive) or negative (e.g., destructive or counterproductive). By synthesizing existing interdisciplinary findings on the consequences of allyship, we provide an integrative review that highlights both its positive and negative consequences at three levels, as well as their potential targets (i.e., individual group members, organizations, and societies). We conclude the article by providing actionable recommendations for both researchers seeking to advance allyship literature, and policymakers and practitioners in the field.

Social Issues and Policy ReviewVol. 20(1)
University of Sussex (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.