A lifecourse perspective on social connectedness via receptiveness to nature

Social isolation is a critical public-health concern, linked to a range of adverse effects, including increased risks of cardiovascular disease, depression, and premature mortality. Addressing the broad social and environmental conditions related to isolation is essential to addressing this epidemic, a fact increasingly recognized by policymakers. Research indicates that exposure to, and experiences in, nature are particularly important influences, with a 2022 systematic review on greenspace and loneliness reporting benefits in two-thirds of included studies. Effective design and management of greenspaces that reduce social isolation also requires attention to how individual factors influence both nature experiences and social interactions in everyday places. Applying a lifecourse-epidemiology approach, this literature synthesis describes how both receptiveness to nature and social connectedness systematically vary across the lifespan. We propose an accumulative lifecourse-effects framework, in which childhood (ages 5-14) and young adulthood (ages 15-24) are sensitive periods, but experiences with nature at all ages shape subsequent behaviors and beliefs essential to the development and maintenance of social ties. Elucidating the specifics of this relationship across four major stages of life (childhood, young adulthood, adulthood [ages 25-59], and older adulthood [ages 60-plus]), we encourage future research that applies a lifecourse lens to this field. In addition, we summarize a range of influences relevant across the lifespan, as well as offering a guide to physical configurations of greenspace and examples of model programs that have applied nature-based interventions to reduce social isolation. Exposure to, and experiences in, nature are key determinants of social ties Lifecourse epidemiology can clarify how nature and social ties vary by age group Accumulative framework proposed, with childhood and young adulthood as sensitive periods Some factors are relevant across lifespan, including gender and cultural background Greenspace design and programming are vital for effective nature-based interventions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129381
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A lifecourse perspective on social connectedness via receptiveness to nature

Sara Barron, Ingrid Jarvis, Emily J. Rugel, Kathleen L. Wolf
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
article

A lifecourse perspective on social connectedness via receptiveness to nature

Sara Barron, Ingrid Jarvis, Emily J. Rugel, Kathleen L. Wolf
article en

Abstract

Social isolation is a critical public-health concern, linked to a range of adverse effects, including increased risks of cardiovascular disease, depression, and premature mortality. Addressing the broad social and environmental conditions related to isolation is essential to addressing this epidemic, a fact increasingly recognized by policymakers. Research indicates that exposure to, and experiences in, nature are particularly important influences, with a 2022 systematic review on greenspace and loneliness reporting benefits in two-thirds of included studies. Effective design and management of greenspaces that reduce social isolation also requires attention to how individual factors influence both nature experiences and social interactions in everyday places. Applying a lifecourse-epidemiology approach, this literature synthesis describes how both receptiveness to nature and social connectedness systematically vary across the lifespan. We propose an accumulative lifecourse-effects framework, in which childhood (ages 5-14) and young adulthood (ages 15-24) are sensitive periods, but experiences with nature at all ages shape subsequent behaviors and beliefs essential to the development and maintenance of social ties. Elucidating the specifics of this relationship across four major stages of life (childhood, young adulthood, adulthood [ages 25-59], and older adulthood [ages 60-plus]), we encourage future research that applies a lifecourse lens to this field. In addition, we summarize a range of influences relevant across the lifespan, as well as offering a guide to physical configurations of greenspace and examples of model programs that have applied nature-based interventions to reduce social isolation. Exposure to, and experiences in, nature are key determinants of social ties Lifecourse epidemiology can clarify how nature and social ties vary by age group Accumulative framework proposed, with childhood and young adulthood as sensitive periods Some factors are relevant across lifespan, including gender and cultural background Greenspace design and programming are vital for effective nature-based interventions

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 119
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Washington (US), Peregrine Power (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.