Embedding a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes: an implementation science evaluation using the theoretical framework of acceptability

Background: Restrictive practices in care homes, such as physical and chemical restraint, remain widespread despite policies advocating minimal use. Implementation science provides tools to understand how evidence-based alternatives can be embedded into practice. This study applied the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to evaluate a co-designed digital educational intervention for care home staff.<br/>Aim: To assess the acceptability, feasibility, and early impact oSavef a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes, guided by the TFA.<br/>Methods A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in 15 care homes in Northern Ireland. Phase 1 measured pre/post changes in staff self-efficacy. Phase 2 audited restrictive practice use before and three months after implementation. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews structured around the seven TFA domains. The intervention was co-produced with staff, residents, families, and professional organizations.<br/>Results: 214 staff participated; 67% had no prior training. Self-efficacy scores increased significantly (mean difference = 16.5, p &lt; .001). Audits showed reductions in mechanical and environmental restraints, while chemical restraint use remained stable. Interviews confirmed high acceptability across TFA domains, with perceived effectiveness and ethical alignment as facilitators, and staff turnover and limited training time as barriers.<br/>Discussion: Using the TFA, this study demonstrates that co-designed digital education is an acceptable and feasible implementation strategy to support restraint reduction. Findings identify mechanisms that foster adoption (confidence, coherence, values alignment) and barriers requiring organisational support. This approach offers a scalable way to embed rights-based, person-centred practice in long-term care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2026-02-13
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes: an implementation science evaluation using the theoretical framework of acceptability

Gary; id_orcid 0000-0003-2133-2998 Mitchell, Stephanie; id_orcid 0000-0003-0783-4975 Craig, Patrick; id_orcid 0000-0003-2659-0865 Stark, Tara; id_orcid 0009-0005-3611-3431 Anderson et al.
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Embedding a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes: an implementation science evaluation using the theoretical framework of acceptability

Gary; id_orcid 0000-0003-2133-2998 Mitchell, Stephanie; id_orcid 0000-0003-0783-4975 Craig, Patrick; id_orcid 0000-0003-2659-0865 Stark, Tara; id_orcid 0009-0005-3611-3431 Anderson, Christine; id_orcid 0000-0002-7861-9538 Brown Wilson, Carole; id_orcid 0000-0003-0012-3927 Parsons
article en

Abstract

Background: Restrictive practices in care homes, such as physical and chemical restraint, remain widespread despite policies advocating minimal use. Implementation science provides tools to understand how evidence-based alternatives can be embedded into practice. This study applied the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to evaluate a co-designed digital educational intervention for care home staff.<br/>Aim: To assess the acceptability, feasibility, and early impact oSavef a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes, guided by the TFA.<br/>Methods A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in 15 care homes in Northern Ireland. Phase 1 measured pre/post changes in staff self-efficacy. Phase 2 audited restrictive practice use before and three months after implementation. Phase 3 involved semi-structured interviews structured around the seven TFA domains. The intervention was co-produced with staff, residents, families, and professional organizations.<br/>Results: 214 staff participated; 67% had no prior training. Self-efficacy scores increased significantly (mean difference = 16.5, p &lt; .001). Audits showed reductions in mechanical and environmental restraints, while chemical restraint use remained stable. Interviews confirmed high acceptability across TFA domains, with perceived effectiveness and ethical alignment as facilitators, and staff turnover and limited training time as barriers.<br/>Discussion: Using the TFA, this study demonstrates that co-designed digital education is an acceptable and feasible implementation strategy to support restraint reduction. Findings identify mechanisms that foster adoption (confidence, coherence, values alignment) and barriers requiring organisational support. This approach offers a scalable way to embed rights-based, person-centred practice in long-term care.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embedding a co-designed digital intervention to reduce restrictive practices in care homes: an implementation science evaluation using the theoretical framework of acceptability — Gary; id_orcid 0000-0003-2133-2998 Mitchell, Stephanie; id_orcid 0000-0003-0783-4975 Craig, et al. · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS