A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study Examining the Validity and Predictive Utility of Step 1 and Step 2 of the Three-Step Theory (3ST) in Adult Psychiatric Inpatients

The primary aim of the proposed study was to examine the validity and predictive utility of the Three-Step Theory (3ST) of suicide. Specifically, this study tested step 1 and step 2 of the 3ST utilizing cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a pre-existing dataset. Participants were 101 U.S. adult psychiatric inpatients (54.5% female, 67.3% non-Hispanic, 67.3% White) assessed at baseline and post-discharge 4 (n = 69) and 8 (n = 49) weeks later. Results did not support the validity and predictive utility of the 3ST. Cross-sectional analysis showed only hopelessness as a robust predictor of suicide ideation, and, connectedness was found to be non-significant protective factor for those high in pain and hopelessness. Regarding the predictive utility, longitudinal analyses showed that only hopelessness was a robust predictor at 4 weeks follow-up but no significant findings were present at 8 weeks follow-up. Conclusions: Results did not support the validity and predictive utility of the 3ST, and thus suggest more stringent testing of the 3ST is necessary in multiple locations and populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study Examining the Validity and Predictive Utility of Step 1 and Step 2 of the Three-Step Theory (3ST) in Adult Psychiatric Inpatients

Stacey A Demirelli
ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study Examining the Validity and Predictive Utility of Step 1 and Step 2 of the Three-Step Theory (3ST) in Adult Psychiatric Inpatients

Stacey A Demirelli
article en

Abstract

The primary aim of the proposed study was to examine the validity and predictive utility of the Three-Step Theory (3ST) of suicide. Specifically, this study tested step 1 and step 2 of the 3ST utilizing cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a pre-existing dataset. Participants were 101 U.S. adult psychiatric inpatients (54.5% female, 67.3% non-Hispanic, 67.3% White) assessed at baseline and post-discharge 4 (n = 69) and 8 (n = 49) weeks later. Results did not support the validity and predictive utility of the 3ST. Cross-sectional analysis showed only hopelessness as a robust predictor of suicide ideation, and, connectedness was found to be non-significant protective factor for those high in pain and hopelessness. Regarding the predictive utility, longitudinal analyses showed that only hopelessness was a robust predictor at 4 weeks follow-up but no significant findings were present at 8 weeks follow-up. Conclusions: Results did not support the validity and predictive utility of the 3ST, and thus suggest more stringent testing of the 3ST is necessary in multiple locations and populations.

ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.