Assessing Willingness to Pay for Genetic Testing Among Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Data from the Omnibus Survey 2022

<b>Background:</b> Population genetic screening (PGS) serves an essential role in identifying individuals at higher risk for hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the current lack of insurance coverage for screening costs might pose a barrier to its adoption. Health systems might contemplate covering these test expenses, but individuals covered by Medicaid and Medicare may not qualify for cost-free screening due to constraints related to the Beneficiary Inducement Statute. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was administered to 602 US adults in January 2023. Andersen's model guided variable selection. An ordered probit model was deployed to explore the association between insurance type and willingness to pay (WTP) for PGS, controlling for demographic and healthcare characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Among the 602 respondents, 524 (87%) were included in our analysis. Over 70% (n = 373) of participants expressed WTP for genetic testing. A similar proportion of respondents with Medicare and Medicaid expressed WTP for screening (68%, and 70%, respectively). Insurance type was not significantly associated with WTP for genetic testing. Notably, lower trust levels and absence of family cancer history were associated with a lower probability of expressing high WTP compared to the reference categories (high levels of trust and having a family cancer history). <b>Conclusions:</b> WTP for genetic testing was not significantly associated with insurance type. Almost 30% of our sample were unwilling to pay for PGS, suggesting variability in WTP for PGS and adding to the limited literature on how individuals value genomic screening tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16030154
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Willingness to Pay for Genetic Testing Among Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Data from the Omnibus Survey 2022

Lauren Hendy, Megan Roberts, Angelo Navas
Journal of Personalized Medicine
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Assessing Willingness to Pay for Genetic Testing Among Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Data from the Omnibus Survey 2022

Lauren Hendy, Megan Roberts, Angelo Navas
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Population genetic screening (PGS) serves an essential role in identifying individuals at higher risk for hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the current lack of insurance coverage for screening costs might pose a barrier to its adoption. Health systems might contemplate covering these test expenses, but individuals covered by Medicaid and Medicare may not qualify for cost-free screening due to constraints related to the Beneficiary Inducement Statute. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was administered to 602 US adults in January 2023. Andersen's model guided variable selection. An ordered probit model was deployed to explore the association between insurance type and willingness to pay (WTP) for PGS, controlling for demographic and healthcare characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Among the 602 respondents, 524 (87%) were included in our analysis. Over 70% (n = 373) of participants expressed WTP for genetic testing. A similar proportion of respondents with Medicare and Medicaid expressed WTP for screening (68%, and 70%, respectively). Insurance type was not significantly associated with WTP for genetic testing. Notably, lower trust levels and absence of family cancer history were associated with a lower probability of expressing high WTP compared to the reference categories (high levels of trust and having a family cancer history). <b>Conclusions:</b> WTP for genetic testing was not significantly associated with insurance type. Almost 30% of our sample were unwilling to pay for PGS, suggesting variability in WTP for PGS and adding to the limited literature on how individuals value genomic screening tests.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.