From Extraction to Cryobanking: Which Critical Process Parameters Genuinely Improve DPSC Production?

<b>Background</b>: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) require strict control of critical process parameters (CPPs) to ensure manufacturing efficiency. The relative impact of donor systemic factors, such as vitamin D status, versus technical process parameters on dental pulp-derived stem cell (DPSC) production remains unclear. <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective observational study, 250 adults undergoing extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included. Dental pulp was processed under a standardized SOP using different preparation methods and enzyme conditions. Primary endpoints were serum 25(OH)D concentration and cell yield; secondary endpoints included number of passages and cryovials. <b>Results</b>: Mean 25(OH)D concentration was 30.1 ± 14.5 ng/mL and was higher in supplemented individuals (38.2 ± 14.0 vs. 25.6 ± 12.7 ng/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but was not associated with cell yield (ρ = 0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.168) or passages (ρ = 0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.406). In contrast, process parameters showed strong effects: scissor preparation resulted in a substantially higher yield than mechanical methods (median 5.00 vs. 1.00 million cells; <i>p</i> = 3.6 × 10<sup>-13</sup>), and type II collagenase was independently associated with a higher yield (+2.04 million cells; <i>p</i> = 0.026). The number of passages was the strongest predictor of yield (β = 2.28 million per passage; <i>p</i> < 10<sup>-26</sup>). Post-thaw viability remained high (mean 90.1% and range 81-98%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Manufacturing efficiency of DPSCs is primarily determined by critical process parameters, particularly preparation method, enzyme selection, and passage control, whereas donor vitamin D status did not significantly influence outcomes under the studied SOP. These findings highlight process standardization as the key driver of reproducible ATMP manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19030429
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Extraction to Cryobanking: Which Critical Process Parameters Genuinely Improve DPSC Production?

Tomasz Gębarowski, Amelie Lupp, Helena R. Moreira, Aneta Cieśla-Niechwiadowicz et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

From Extraction to Cryobanking: Which Critical Process Parameters Genuinely Improve DPSC Production?

Tomasz Gębarowski, Amelie Lupp, Helena R. Moreira, Aneta Cieśla-Niechwiadowicz, Katarzyna Gębczak, Ewa Barg, Jakub Hadzik, Benita Wiatrak, Tomasz Gedrange, Sophie Gedrange, Łucja Cwynar-Zając
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) require strict control of critical process parameters (CPPs) to ensure manufacturing efficiency. The relative impact of donor systemic factors, such as vitamin D status, versus technical process parameters on dental pulp-derived stem cell (DPSC) production remains unclear. <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective observational study, 250 adults undergoing extraction of impacted mandibular third molars were included. Dental pulp was processed under a standardized SOP using different preparation methods and enzyme conditions. Primary endpoints were serum 25(OH)D concentration and cell yield; secondary endpoints included number of passages and cryovials. <b>Results</b>: Mean 25(OH)D concentration was 30.1 ± 14.5 ng/mL and was higher in supplemented individuals (38.2 ± 14.0 vs. 25.6 ± 12.7 ng/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but was not associated with cell yield (ρ = 0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.168) or passages (ρ = 0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.406). In contrast, process parameters showed strong effects: scissor preparation resulted in a substantially higher yield than mechanical methods (median 5.00 vs. 1.00 million cells; <i>p</i> = 3.6 × 10<sup>-13</sup>), and type II collagenase was independently associated with a higher yield (+2.04 million cells; <i>p</i> = 0.026). The number of passages was the strongest predictor of yield (β = 2.28 million per passage; <i>p</i> < 10<sup>-26</sup>). Post-thaw viability remained high (mean 90.1% and range 81-98%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Manufacturing efficiency of DPSCs is primarily determined by critical process parameters, particularly preparation method, enzyme selection, and passage control, whereas donor vitamin D status did not significantly influence outcomes under the studied SOP. These findings highlight process standardization as the key driver of reproducible ATMP manufacturing.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(3)
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Jena University Hospital (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.