Leveraging complex systems: Leading for transformative change

As with other sectors over the last few years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping the education ecosystem introducing new epistemic, ethical, and organisational challenges. Education leaders face the need to shift established systems and processes to reimagine how more adaptive complexity-informed GenAI enabled systems operate with new governance, pedagogy, and strategic decision-making. In this context, traditional bureaucratic leadership structures are ill-suited for the pace, scale, and sociotechnical nature of the ongoing technological disruption. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel leadership framework called SPARK, designed to operationalise Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) in the new emerging educational contexts. The framework is grounded in CLT and designed to enable system-level transformation in educational institutions. Drawing on Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts, Perez’s technoeconomic framework, and Uhl-Bien’s complexity leadership, the paper situates educational change within broader patterns of sociotechnical transformation and institutional misalignment. The SPARK framework (Systems, Problem, Analysis, Research, and Knowledge brokerage) provides a structured approach for educational leaders to navigate the tensions between institutional stability and the increasing demand for systemic innovation. SPARK combines distributed agency, adaptive capacity, and network-based leadership to guide the translation of high-potential innovations such as GenAI-enhanced pedagogy from isolated pilots to scalable, systemic practices. By embedding both technical infrastructure and social context within its design, SPARK provides effective guidelines for leaders to foster cultures of experimentation, trust and resilience. The paper argues that the systemic adoption of GenAI in education requires more radical approaches that go beyond mere technical implementations. It demands a new paradigm with reconfigured leadership models, professional identities and institutional logics. SPARK offers a pragmatic approach to assist leaders in responding to GenAI’s disruptive potential with intentional, sustainable, and equitable change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100563
Primary Topic
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging complex systems: Leading for transformative change

Shane Dawson, Abelardo Pardo
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
article

Leveraging complex systems: Leading for transformative change

Shane Dawson, Abelardo Pardo
article en

Abstract

As with other sectors over the last few years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping the education ecosystem introducing new epistemic, ethical, and organisational challenges. Education leaders face the need to shift established systems and processes to reimagine how more adaptive complexity-informed GenAI enabled systems operate with new governance, pedagogy, and strategic decision-making. In this context, traditional bureaucratic leadership structures are ill-suited for the pace, scale, and sociotechnical nature of the ongoing technological disruption. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel leadership framework called SPARK, designed to operationalise Complexity Leadership Theory (CLT) in the new emerging educational contexts. The framework is grounded in CLT and designed to enable system-level transformation in educational institutions. Drawing on Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts, Perez’s technoeconomic framework, and Uhl-Bien’s complexity leadership, the paper situates educational change within broader patterns of sociotechnical transformation and institutional misalignment. The SPARK framework (Systems, Problem, Analysis, Research, and Knowledge brokerage) provides a structured approach for educational leaders to navigate the tensions between institutional stability and the increasing demand for systemic innovation. SPARK combines distributed agency, adaptive capacity, and network-based leadership to guide the translation of high-potential innovations such as GenAI-enhanced pedagogy from isolated pilots to scalable, systemic practices. By embedding both technical infrastructure and social context within its design, SPARK provides effective guidelines for leaders to foster cultures of experimentation, trust and resilience. The paper argues that the systemic adoption of GenAI in education requires more radical approaches that go beyond mere technical implementations. It demands a new paradigm with reconfigured leadership models, professional identities and institutional logics. SPARK offers a pragmatic approach to assist leaders in responding to GenAI’s disruptive potential with intentional, sustainable, and equitable change.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 10
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.