Verification of AI–based environmental forecasting systems: What can we do, what do we need to do, and what are the challenges?

Several institutions have released global medium–range meteorological forecasting models based on methods from machine learning, with training data provided by various reanalysis experiments. A proper and in-depth assessment of these models and the quality of their forecasts has yet to be carried out. Although in terms of simple and overall measures of skill such as mean square errors, AI-based forecasts clearly show very promising skill, we are just beginning to understand where and when these forecasts are useful and when they are not. Furthermore, while verification of meteorological forecasts has been subject to extensive (and still ongoing) research with a well established core methodology, it is not clear to what extent this methodology needs to be adapted or modified for AI–based models. Our paper aims to provide a vision on the verification of AI–based weather forecasts, identifying challenges, outlining important research questions, and laying the groundwork for a methodology to assess the quality of such forecasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Meteorological Society.
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemets.2026.100032
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of AI–based environmental forecasting systems: What can we do, what do we need to do, and what are the challenges?

Helen Dacre, Tobias Necker, Jochen Bröcker, Zied Ben Bouallègue et al.
Journal of the European Meteorological Society.
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Verification of AI–based environmental forecasting systems: What can we do, what do we need to do, and what are the challenges?

Helen Dacre, Tobias Necker, Jochen Bröcker, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Simon Driscoll, Jose Rodriguez, Natalie Harvey
article en

Abstract

Several institutions have released global medium–range meteorological forecasting models based on methods from machine learning, with training data provided by various reanalysis experiments. A proper and in-depth assessment of these models and the quality of their forecasts has yet to be carried out. Although in terms of simple and overall measures of skill such as mean square errors, AI-based forecasts clearly show very promising skill, we are just beginning to understand where and when these forecasts are useful and when they are not. Furthermore, while verification of meteorological forecasts has been subject to extensive (and still ongoing) research with a well established core methodology, it is not clear to what extent this methodology needs to be adapted or modified for AI–based models. Our paper aims to provide a vision on the verification of AI–based weather forecasts, identifying challenges, outlining important research questions, and laying the groundwork for a methodology to assess the quality of such forecasts.

Journal of the European Meteorological Society.Vol. 4
Met Office (GB), University of Vienna (AT), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.