Patient-reported outcomes decline over time following arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability

Purpose: To evaluate how patient-reported outcomes (PROs) trend over time following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for anterior shoulder instability with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing ABR with or without remplissage between 2007-2023.Exclusion criteria included age <14 years, glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track HSLs, and prior shoulder surgery.PROs and clinical outcomes-including Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI), pain Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and recurrent instabilitywere collected at final follow-up.Spearman Rank correlation assessed relationships between PROs and time from surgery.Rates of achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for WOSI and pVAS were compared across followup intervals (<5 years, 5-9 years, 10 years) and between patients with and without recurrent instability.Significance was set at p<0.05.Results: A total of 121 patients (age: 238 years, 27% females) were included at mean followup of 7.1 years (range: 1.6-17.2).Longer follow-up duration was associated with worsening WOSI (r=0.239;p=0.008), pVAS (r=0.180;p=0.049), and SSV (r=-0.186;p=0.041) scores.Patients undergoing isolated ABR demonstrated significant deterioration in PROs over time (WOSI: r=0.331, p=0.002; pVAS: r=0.261, p=0.015;SSV: r=-0.216,p=0.045), whereas those undergoing remplissage showed no change in PROs over time (all p>0.05).Patients with recurrent instability had lower rates of achieving WOSI PASS at <5 years (56% vs 88%; p = 0.029), 5-9 years (22% vs 87%; p <0.001), and 10 years (20% vs 86%; p <0.001) compared to patients without recurrent instability.On linear regression analysis, longer follow-up length remained an independent predictor of worse WOSI scores after controlling for recurrent instability. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o fConclusion: PROs may decline over time following ABR for anterior shoulder instability for patients who experience recurrent anterior shoulder instability and undergo isolated ABR compared to ABR with remplissage.These findings may be relevant for preoperative counseling regarding long-term subjective outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100719
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported outcomes decline over time following arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability

Mark W. Rodosky, Andrew Y. Liu, Jonathan D. Hughes, Sahil Dadoo et al.
JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Patient-reported outcomes decline over time following arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability

Mark W. Rodosky, Andrew Y. Liu, Jonathan D. Hughes, Sahil Dadoo, Ryan T. Lin, Neel Bhardwaj, Kyle E. Andrade-Bucknor, Ryan Gilbert, Shaquille Charles, Albert Lin, Bryson P. Lesniak, Tyler C. Williams, Adam Popchak
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate how patient-reported outcomes (PROs) trend over time following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for anterior shoulder instability with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL). Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing ABR with or without remplissage between 2007-2023.Exclusion criteria included age <14 years, glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track HSLs, and prior shoulder surgery.PROs and clinical outcomes-including Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI), pain Visual Analog Scale (pVAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and recurrent instabilitywere collected at final follow-up.Spearman Rank correlation assessed relationships between PROs and time from surgery.Rates of achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for WOSI and pVAS were compared across followup intervals (<5 years, 5-9 years, 10 years) and between patients with and without recurrent instability.Significance was set at p<0.05.Results: A total of 121 patients (age: 238 years, 27% females) were included at mean followup of 7.1 years (range: 1.6-17.2).Longer follow-up duration was associated with worsening WOSI (r=0.239;p=0.008), pVAS (r=0.180;p=0.049), and SSV (r=-0.186;p=0.041) scores.Patients undergoing isolated ABR demonstrated significant deterioration in PROs over time (WOSI: r=0.331, p=0.002; pVAS: r=0.261, p=0.015;SSV: r=-0.216,p=0.045), whereas those undergoing remplissage showed no change in PROs over time (all p>0.05).Patients with recurrent instability had lower rates of achieving WOSI PASS at <5 years (56% vs 88%; p = 0.029), 5-9 years (22% vs 87%; p <0.001), and 10 years (20% vs 86%; p <0.001) compared to patients without recurrent instability.On linear regression analysis, longer follow-up length remained an independent predictor of worse WOSI scores after controlling for recurrent instability. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o fConclusion: PROs may decline over time following ABR for anterior shoulder instability for patients who experience recurrent anterior shoulder instability and undergo isolated ABR compared to ABR with remplissage.These findings may be relevant for preoperative counseling regarding long-term subjective outcomes.

JSES Reviews Reports and TechniquesVol. 6(2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.