Timing and extent of Peri-Implant bone loss for dental implant removal: A retrospective Cross-Sectional analysis

The occurrence of dental implant loss has not been systematically investigated. This study assessed the extent of radiological crestal bone loss at time of dental implant removal and the timing of dental implant removal. Patients transferred to the Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery of the University clinic of Freiburg, Germany, between 2014 and 2024 for dental implant removal were retrospectively analyzed. Radiological bone loss was determined using panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Further data included patient demographics, implant characteristics, bone defect morphology, and specific reasons for removal. 738 implant removals in 462 patients were included. Peri-implant inflammation accounted for 71% of implant removals, with 83% of late implant losses attributed to this cause. The mean radiological bone loss at time of implant removal was 51% (SD: 28%) and was significantly higher in the mandible than in the maxilla (p < 0.001). Most implants were lost three years after placement. At later time points, less implants were removed. Average bone loss levels at the time of implant removal increased over time, ranging from 36% in the first three years to 60% in years 8 to 10 (p = 0.002). Complete loss of osseointegration was observed more frequently over time. This study provides the first large-scale systematic assessment of dental implant loss. Peri-implant bone loss was confirmed as the leading cause of dental implant failure. Within this monocentric clinical setting, dental implant removal was closely associated with a radiographic bone loss threshold of around 50%, underscoring its potential value for clinical decision-making in advanced peri-implant disease. A radiographic bone loss level of approximately 50 % may serve as a pragmatic threshold to escalate from salvage concepts towards the decision of implant removal in advanced peri-implant disease. The high proportion of implant removals occurring in the early years after placement highlights the importance of early clinical surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06774-2
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing and extent of Peri-Implant bone loss for dental implant removal: A retrospective Cross-Sectional analysis

Florian Kernen, Marc Christian Metzger, Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Fabian Cieplik et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Timing and extent of Peri-Implant bone loss for dental implant removal: A retrospective Cross-Sectional analysis

Florian Kernen, Marc Christian Metzger, Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Fabian Cieplik, Tim Halstenbach, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Erik Würflein
article en

Abstract

The occurrence of dental implant loss has not been systematically investigated. This study assessed the extent of radiological crestal bone loss at time of dental implant removal and the timing of dental implant removal. Patients transferred to the Department of Oral- and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery of the University clinic of Freiburg, Germany, between 2014 and 2024 for dental implant removal were retrospectively analyzed. Radiological bone loss was determined using panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Further data included patient demographics, implant characteristics, bone defect morphology, and specific reasons for removal. 738 implant removals in 462 patients were included. Peri-implant inflammation accounted for 71% of implant removals, with 83% of late implant losses attributed to this cause. The mean radiological bone loss at time of implant removal was 51% (SD: 28%) and was significantly higher in the mandible than in the maxilla (p < 0.001). Most implants were lost three years after placement. At later time points, less implants were removed. Average bone loss levels at the time of implant removal increased over time, ranging from 36% in the first three years to 60% in years 8 to 10 (p = 0.002). Complete loss of osseointegration was observed more frequently over time. This study provides the first large-scale systematic assessment of dental implant loss. Peri-implant bone loss was confirmed as the leading cause of dental implant failure. Within this monocentric clinical setting, dental implant removal was closely associated with a radiographic bone loss threshold of around 50%, underscoring its potential value for clinical decision-making in advanced peri-implant disease. A radiographic bone loss level of approximately 50 % may serve as a pragmatic threshold to escalate from salvage concepts towards the decision of implant removal in advanced peri-implant disease. The high proportion of implant removals occurring in the early years after placement highlights the importance of early clinical surveillance.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 30(3)
University of Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.