Prevalence of gingival recession and its associated risk factors in the mandibular central incisors of Chinese patients following fixed orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

This retrospective study was designed to describe and compare the prevalence and severity of gingival recession (GR) in the mandibular central incisor region. Additionally, it sought to identify potential risk factors associated with GR. According to the selection criteria, a total 286 Chinese patients who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment between January 2019 to March 2024, 123 males (43.0%) and 163 females (57.0%), were included in the study. The following parameters were assessed: gingival recession depth (GRD), gingival biotype (GBT), keratinized gingival width (KGW), incisor-mandibular plane angle (IMPA), and labial alveolar bone thickness at the alveolar ridge crest, middle, and apical region (LBT-crest, LBT-mid, LBT-apex). Data were obtained anonymously from the pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1) archival records. Based on the difference in IMPA between T1 and T0, subjects were categorized into protrusion and retrusion groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson’s chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses identified the risk factors for GR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to determine the optimal cut-off values for the high-risk factors of GR. There were 75 subjects (26.2%) with GR and 211 participants (73.8%) without GR at T1, all of whom had ideal gingival margin positions at T0. The protrusion group had a significantly higher GRD (0.31 ± 0.52 mm) than the retrusion group (0.06 ± 0.12 mm, P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in the occurrence rate of GR was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to GR patients, non-GR subjects exhibited statistically lower ∆IMPA values, higher KGW, LBT-crest, LBT-mid, and LBT-apex. Furthermore, statistically significant associations was found between the occurrence of GR following orthodontic treatment and GBT, KGW and LBT-crest. The optimal cut-off values for KGW (T0), KGW (T1), LBT-crest (T0), and LBT-crest (T1) were 2.70 mm, 2.23 mm, 0.72 mm, and 0.73 mm, respectively. Thin GBT, narrow KGW, and thin LBT-crest may increase the risk of GR. A minimum LBT-crest of 0.72 mm and KGW of 2.70 mm prior to orthodontic treatment may effectively prevent the occurrence of GR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08013-2
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of gingival recession and its associated risk factors in the mandibular central incisors of Chinese patients following fixed orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

Zichuan Zhang, Cheng Jia, Xiaoyan Li
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Prevalence of gingival recession and its associated risk factors in the mandibular central incisors of Chinese patients following fixed orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

Zichuan Zhang, Cheng Jia, Xiaoyan Li
article en

Abstract

This retrospective study was designed to describe and compare the prevalence and severity of gingival recession (GR) in the mandibular central incisor region. Additionally, it sought to identify potential risk factors associated with GR. According to the selection criteria, a total 286 Chinese patients who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment between January 2019 to March 2024, 123 males (43.0%) and 163 females (57.0%), were included in the study. The following parameters were assessed: gingival recession depth (GRD), gingival biotype (GBT), keratinized gingival width (KGW), incisor-mandibular plane angle (IMPA), and labial alveolar bone thickness at the alveolar ridge crest, middle, and apical region (LBT-crest, LBT-mid, LBT-apex). Data were obtained anonymously from the pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1) archival records. Based on the difference in IMPA between T1 and T0, subjects were categorized into protrusion and retrusion groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson’s chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses identified the risk factors for GR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to determine the optimal cut-off values for the high-risk factors of GR. There were 75 subjects (26.2%) with GR and 211 participants (73.8%) without GR at T1, all of whom had ideal gingival margin positions at T0. The protrusion group had a significantly higher GRD (0.31 ± 0.52 mm) than the retrusion group (0.06 ± 0.12 mm, P < 0.05). However, no significant difference in the occurrence rate of GR was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to GR patients, non-GR subjects exhibited statistically lower ∆IMPA values, higher KGW, LBT-crest, LBT-mid, and LBT-apex. Furthermore, statistically significant associations was found between the occurrence of GR following orthodontic treatment and GBT, KGW and LBT-crest. The optimal cut-off values for KGW (T0), KGW (T1), LBT-crest (T0), and LBT-crest (T1) were 2.70 mm, 2.23 mm, 0.72 mm, and 0.73 mm, respectively. Thin GBT, narrow KGW, and thin LBT-crest may increase the risk of GR. A minimum LBT-crest of 0.72 mm and KGW of 2.70 mm prior to orthodontic treatment may effectively prevent the occurrence of GR.

BMC Oral Health
Hebei Medical University (CN), Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Bethune International Peace Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.