Infrared spectroscopy prediction of soil microbial properties across Australian soils: Drivers and limitations

Soil microbial properties are increasingly recognised as a crucial metric of both soil condition and soil carbon dynamics. However, these properties remain underutilised due to challenges in quantifying these properties at scale. This study assesses the potential for Near (NIR) and Mid (MIR) Infrared spectroscopy, as well as Granger Ramanathan Averaging (GRA) models that integrate predictions from both spectra simultaneously, to provide reliable estimations of microbial properties when incorporating a range of soil samples collected across Australia. Given that these properties are not spectrally active, the accuracy of their predictions relies on correlations with physicochemical properties such as organic matter, clay minerals and soil moisture. Using soil samples from across Australia, the most effective models for DNA yield, microbial respiration (MR) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) enzyme activity achieved R 2 of 0.7, 0.63 and 0.62, though microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and β-glucosidase (BG) enzyme activity predictions were more modest with R 2 = 0.52 and 0.49, respectively. MIR consistently outperformed NIR, whereas data fusion models were comparable to MIR across all properties, except for a slight improvement in MBC from R 2 = 0.46 to R 2 = 0.52. From the correlational analysis, the key properties driving these predictions were moisture for both enzymes (r = 0.35-0.36) and organic carbon for all other properties (r = 0.34-0.56), as indicated by significant wavenumbers in the MIR spectrum. However, the reliance on the moisture peak highlights a potential limitation in predicting properties measured from field-condition soils using spectra generated from pre-processed, air-dried samples. Overall, these findings are generally encouraging for predicting microbial properties from the MIR spectrum, supporting their future use in assessing soil condition and monitoring carbon dynamics. Verifying these correlations is crucial to ensuring the wider applicability of these algorithms across diverse samples and to expanding spectral libraries. • Infrared spectroscopy shows potential to predict various soil microbial properties • MIR consistently outperformed NIR, with fusion models yielding similar results • TOC was most significant for MBC, microbial respiration and DNA yield • Moisture was significant for both BG and NAG enzyme activities • Further research should consider the variable moisture content between analyses

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil & Environmental Health
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seh.2026.100205
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrared spectroscopy prediction of soil microbial properties across Australian soils: Drivers and limitations

Wartini Ng, Alexander Broadfoot McBratney, Thi Kim Anh Tran, Peipei Xue et al.
Soil & Environmental Health
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Infrared spectroscopy prediction of soil microbial properties across Australian soils: Drivers and limitations

Wartini Ng, Alexander Broadfoot McBratney, Thi Kim Anh Tran, Peipei Xue, Sabina Poudel, Yijia Tang, Daniel Irving, Budiman Minasny
article en

Abstract

Soil microbial properties are increasingly recognised as a crucial metric of both soil condition and soil carbon dynamics. However, these properties remain underutilised due to challenges in quantifying these properties at scale. This study assesses the potential for Near (NIR) and Mid (MIR) Infrared spectroscopy, as well as Granger Ramanathan Averaging (GRA) models that integrate predictions from both spectra simultaneously, to provide reliable estimations of microbial properties when incorporating a range of soil samples collected across Australia. Given that these properties are not spectrally active, the accuracy of their predictions relies on correlations with physicochemical properties such as organic matter, clay minerals and soil moisture. Using soil samples from across Australia, the most effective models for DNA yield, microbial respiration (MR) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) enzyme activity achieved R 2 of 0.7, 0.63 and 0.62, though microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and β-glucosidase (BG) enzyme activity predictions were more modest with R 2 = 0.52 and 0.49, respectively. MIR consistently outperformed NIR, whereas data fusion models were comparable to MIR across all properties, except for a slight improvement in MBC from R 2 = 0.46 to R 2 = 0.52. From the correlational analysis, the key properties driving these predictions were moisture for both enzymes (r = 0.35-0.36) and organic carbon for all other properties (r = 0.34-0.56), as indicated by significant wavenumbers in the MIR spectrum. However, the reliance on the moisture peak highlights a potential limitation in predicting properties measured from field-condition soils using spectra generated from pre-processed, air-dried samples. Overall, these findings are generally encouraging for predicting microbial properties from the MIR spectrum, supporting their future use in assessing soil condition and monitoring carbon dynamics. Verifying these correlations is crucial to ensuring the wider applicability of these algorithms across diverse samples and to expanding spectral libraries. • Infrared spectroscopy shows potential to predict various soil microbial properties • MIR consistently outperformed NIR, with fusion models yielding similar results • TOC was most significant for MBC, microbial respiration and DNA yield • Moisture was significant for both BG and NAG enzyme activities • Further research should consider the variable moisture content between analyses

Soil & Environmental HealthVol. 4(2)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.