Institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations in decolonizing North–South research collaborations: a scoping review

This article seeks to inform the quest to decolonize research collaborations between the North (N) and South (S) that started as early as the 1970s, given the prevailing power asymmetries that continue to hinder equitable collaboration. The article is based on a scoping literature review study that sought to interrogate the institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations employed in past and ongoing N–S research collaborations. The search strategy for the relevant literature was iterative and was implemented between May and November 2023. The results identify institutional settings that define collaborations and partnerships for research between N–S institutions and researchers. The institutional settings (power dynamics and motivations) are defined by the access to resources that sets the power positions of the different actors within a research collaboration, often with partners in the South then having lesser bargaining power positions. There are intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for collaborations and partnerships that are important for decolonizing N–S research. Considering the institutional settings that shape the N–S research partnerships is recommended. This would inform the decolonizing process of N–S research and balance the power dynamics, remove barriers and promote the motivators to empower collaborators at individual and institutional settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Social Challenges Journal
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2026d000000081
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations in decolonizing North–South research collaborations: a scoping review

O. Ravaka Andriamihaja, Washington Onyango-Ouma, Ama Asantewah Ahene-Codjoe, Mariah Ngutu et al.
Global Social Challenges Journal
Global Health and Surgery
article

Institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations in decolonizing North–South research collaborations: a scoping review

O. Ravaka Andriamihaja, Washington Onyango-Ouma, Ama Asantewah Ahene-Codjoe, Mariah Ngutu, Fabian Käser
article en

Abstract

This article seeks to inform the quest to decolonize research collaborations between the North (N) and South (S) that started as early as the 1970s, given the prevailing power asymmetries that continue to hinder equitable collaboration. The article is based on a scoping literature review study that sought to interrogate the institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations employed in past and ongoing N–S research collaborations. The search strategy for the relevant literature was iterative and was implemented between May and November 2023. The results identify institutional settings that define collaborations and partnerships for research between N–S institutions and researchers. The institutional settings (power dynamics and motivations) are defined by the access to resources that sets the power positions of the different actors within a research collaboration, often with partners in the South then having lesser bargaining power positions. There are intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for collaborations and partnerships that are important for decolonizing N–S research. Considering the institutional settings that shape the N–S research partnerships is recommended. This would inform the decolonizing process of N–S research and balance the power dynamics, remove barriers and promote the motivators to empower collaborators at individual and institutional settings.

Global Social Challenges Journal
University of Nairobi (KE), University of Antananarivo (MG), University of Ghana (GH), Swiss Academy of Sciences (CH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional settings, power dynamics and motivations in decolonizing North–South research collaborations: a scoping review — O. Ravaka Andriamihaja, Washington Onyango-Ouma, et al. · Global Social Challenges Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS