A Comparison of Optimisation Algorithms for Electronic Polarisation Control in Quantum Key Distribution

Polarisation encoding is widely used in fibre-based Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), but random birefringence in optical fibres causes the transmitted states to drift, requiring active compensation at the receiver. Electronic Polarisation Controllers (EPCs) are commonly used for this purpose, yet the relationship between their control voltages and the resulting polarisation transformation is highly nonlinear and difficult to model. While optimisation algorithms are frequently employed to align and stabilise polarisation states, their comparative performance has not been systematically studied in realistic QKD settings. In this work, we benchmark four optimisation algorithms for electronic polarisation control, using both a numerical model and a 50 km fibre-based experimental setup. We evaluate each algorithm in terms of convergence time, failure rate, and stability, under both initial alignment and continuous drift compensation scenarios. Coordinate Descent achieved the fastest average alignment time (2.1 ms in simulation; 34.6 s experimentally), while Simulated Annealing delivered perfect reliability. We further propose a hybrid control strategy that combines fast initial alignment with high-reliability realignment. This approach was validated over a continuous 2 h QKD simulation with real fibre drift, demonstrating robust polarisation control without manual intervention. Our results provide guidance for algorithm selection in practical QKD deployments and suggest a pathway to resilient, autonomous polarisation tracking in long-distance quantum networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052568
Primary Topic
Optical Network Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Optimisation Algorithms for Electronic Polarisation Control in Quantum Key Distribution

H. Duan, Stefano Pirandola, Matt Young, Marco Lucamarini
Applied Sciences
Optical Network Technologies
article

A Comparison of Optimisation Algorithms for Electronic Polarisation Control in Quantum Key Distribution

H. Duan, Stefano Pirandola, Matt Young, Marco Lucamarini
article en

Abstract

Polarisation encoding is widely used in fibre-based Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), but random birefringence in optical fibres causes the transmitted states to drift, requiring active compensation at the receiver. Electronic Polarisation Controllers (EPCs) are commonly used for this purpose, yet the relationship between their control voltages and the resulting polarisation transformation is highly nonlinear and difficult to model. While optimisation algorithms are frequently employed to align and stabilise polarisation states, their comparative performance has not been systematically studied in realistic QKD settings. In this work, we benchmark four optimisation algorithms for electronic polarisation control, using both a numerical model and a 50 km fibre-based experimental setup. We evaluate each algorithm in terms of convergence time, failure rate, and stability, under both initial alignment and continuous drift compensation scenarios. Coordinate Descent achieved the fastest average alignment time (2.1 ms in simulation; 34.6 s experimentally), while Simulated Annealing delivered perfect reliability. We further propose a hybrid control strategy that combines fast initial alignment with high-reliability realignment. This approach was validated over a continuous 2 h QKD simulation with real fibre drift, demonstrating robust polarisation control without manual intervention. Our results provide guidance for algorithm selection in practical QKD deployments and suggest a pathway to resilient, autonomous polarisation tracking in long-distance quantum networks.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(5)
University of York (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Optical Network Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.