Gender Differences in Service Provision for Victims of Interpersonal Violence: The Moderating Role of Relationship Type

Research suggests that male victims of interpersonal violence (IPV) experience differential treatment when seeking help from service providers. However, little research has explicitly investigated gender differences in actual service provision. The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in the number and type of services provided to IPV victims by the social services (research question 1), as well as if these gender differences vary depending on the victim’s type of relation with the offender (research question 2). We used data from the SU-Kvinnofrid (“Women’s peace/safety”) project, with information on all IPV victims (n = 2,998; 2,814 female and 184 male) seeking support from the social services in 34 Swedish municipalities. Data were analyzed using logistic and negative binomial regression models. On average, there were no or only small gender differences in service provision. However, these average differences masked significant variation based on the offender’s relationship to the victim. Men generally received fewer services when victimized by a partner but more when victimized by a non-partner (e.g., a family member); a pattern primarily driven by safety-focused and, to a lesser extent, practical support. The findings do not support the view that there is a general bias against male victims. Rather, they suggest that service provision is critically shaped by the inherently relational nature of IPV, and that gender differences in treatment cannot be understood by only focusing on the gender of the victim. Future research should not only adopt a positional perspective – stressing men as victims – but also a relational perspective, focusing on how different types of relationships influence service provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-026-01058-5
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Service Provision for Victims of Interpersonal Violence: The Moderating Role of Relationship Type

Björn Högberg, Björn Blom, Johanna Sundqvist, Marie-Louise Snellman et al.
Journal of Family Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Gender Differences in Service Provision for Victims of Interpersonal Violence: The Moderating Role of Relationship Type

Björn Högberg, Björn Blom, Johanna Sundqvist, Marie-Louise Snellman, Jens Lindberg
article en

Abstract

Research suggests that male victims of interpersonal violence (IPV) experience differential treatment when seeking help from service providers. However, little research has explicitly investigated gender differences in actual service provision. The present study investigated whether there are gender differences in the number and type of services provided to IPV victims by the social services (research question 1), as well as if these gender differences vary depending on the victim’s type of relation with the offender (research question 2). We used data from the SU-Kvinnofrid (“Women’s peace/safety”) project, with information on all IPV victims (n = 2,998; 2,814 female and 184 male) seeking support from the social services in 34 Swedish municipalities. Data were analyzed using logistic and negative binomial regression models. On average, there were no or only small gender differences in service provision. However, these average differences masked significant variation based on the offender’s relationship to the victim. Men generally received fewer services when victimized by a partner but more when victimized by a non-partner (e.g., a family member); a pattern primarily driven by safety-focused and, to a lesser extent, practical support. The findings do not support the view that there is a general bias against male victims. Rather, they suggest that service provision is critically shaped by the inherently relational nature of IPV, and that gender differences in treatment cannot be understood by only focusing on the gender of the victim. Future research should not only adopt a positional perspective – stressing men as victims – but also a relational perspective, focusing on how different types of relationships influence service provision.

Journal of Family Violence
Swedish Police Authority (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.