Crossing symmetry including non planar diagrams in perturbative QFT

A bstract We venture a proof of crossing symmetry for non-planar diagrams in perturbative QFT. For the planar diagrams a proof of crossing is available in the literature and our method closely follows the one depicted in that case. We classify the non-planar diagrams broadly into two types. For one of these types the proof is pretty straightforward and hence the result extends to all point all loop on-shell amplitudes. These are called the “trivial” cases while for the other type we find certain cases called the “non trivial” cases for which the proof is much more subtle. We present an explicit example of such a “non trivial” case at 3-loop order and argue how the proof of crossing symmetry holds true when all subtleties are taken into consideration. Based on this simple example we argue how the proof works out in general for these “non-trivial” cases at higher loop and with arbitrary number of non-planar edges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2026)012
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crossing symmetry including non planar diagrams in perturbative QFT

Ritabrata Bhattacharya
Journal of High Energy Physics
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
article

Crossing symmetry including non planar diagrams in perturbative QFT

Ritabrata Bhattacharya
article en

Abstract

A bstract We venture a proof of crossing symmetry for non-planar diagrams in perturbative QFT. For the planar diagrams a proof of crossing is available in the literature and our method closely follows the one depicted in that case. We classify the non-planar diagrams broadly into two types. For one of these types the proof is pretty straightforward and hence the result extends to all point all loop on-shell amplitudes. These are called the “trivial” cases while for the other type we find certain cases called the “non trivial” cases for which the proof is much more subtle. We present an explicit example of such a “non trivial” case at 3-loop order and argue how the proof of crossing symmetry holds true when all subtleties are taken into consideration. Based on this simple example we argue how the proof works out in general for these “non-trivial” cases at higher loop and with arbitrary number of non-planar edges.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2026(3)
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN)
National Science Foundation, Arthritis National Research Foundation, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.