Sensitivity Analysis of Toric and Multifocal IOL Optical Performance to Postoperative Tilt in the Presence of Corneal Aberrations

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are recognized as a solution in the treatment of eye conditions, particularly cataracts, by restoring vision through the replacement of the eye’s natural lens. Selecting the appropriate type of IOL, based on individual patient characteristics such as corneal aberrations, plays a crucial role in the visual outcomes after surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of innovative diffractive multifocal and toric IOLs in treating visual impairment associated with corneal aberrations using computational modeling. The study examined how aberrations affected the quality of retinal images as measured by the modulation transfer function (MTF), peak-to-valley wavefront error, and root mean square (RMS) wavefront error. The results showed that contrast and resolution in near, intermediate, and far vision were much enhanced by optimized IOL designs. Postoperative IOL tilt cannot be predicted preoperatively; therefore, this study is framed as a sensitivity analysis evaluating how varying degrees of tilt affect optical quality across different IOL designs. Our simulations also revealed that IOL tilt negatively correlated with visual acuity, especially toric IOLs showing greater sensitivity due to increased tilt-induced astigmatism. Since this approach is tailored to the individual characteristics, the results support the development of IOL designs with improved tolerance to tilt-induced aberrations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OICC Press Journals
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57647/jtap.2026.8604.0304
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity Analysis of Toric and Multifocal IOL Optical Performance to Postoperative Tilt in the Presence of Corneal Aberrations

Maliheh Ranjbaran, Mobina Sadat Maroufi, Amirhesam Mehri
OICC Press Journals
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Sensitivity Analysis of Toric and Multifocal IOL Optical Performance to Postoperative Tilt in the Presence of Corneal Aberrations

Maliheh Ranjbaran, Mobina Sadat Maroufi, Amirhesam Mehri
article en

Abstract

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are recognized as a solution in the treatment of eye conditions, particularly cataracts, by restoring vision through the replacement of the eye’s natural lens. Selecting the appropriate type of IOL, based on individual patient characteristics such as corneal aberrations, plays a crucial role in the visual outcomes after surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of innovative diffractive multifocal and toric IOLs in treating visual impairment associated with corneal aberrations using computational modeling. The study examined how aberrations affected the quality of retinal images as measured by the modulation transfer function (MTF), peak-to-valley wavefront error, and root mean square (RMS) wavefront error. The results showed that contrast and resolution in near, intermediate, and far vision were much enhanced by optimized IOL designs. Postoperative IOL tilt cannot be predicted preoperatively; therefore, this study is framed as a sensitivity analysis evaluating how varying degrees of tilt affect optical quality across different IOL designs. Our simulations also revealed that IOL tilt negatively correlated with visual acuity, especially toric IOLs showing greater sensitivity due to increased tilt-induced astigmatism. Since this approach is tailored to the individual characteristics, the results support the development of IOL designs with improved tolerance to tilt-induced aberrations.

OICC Press Journals
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.