Artificial intelligence and machine learning in drug discovery: From lead discovery to clinical validation (2020–2025)

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are fundamentally changing the small-molecule drug discovery process, primarily by moving the workflow from being empirically screened to data-driven, designed ones. This narrative review consolidates peer-reviewed studies and industry-validated reports published between 1 January 2020 and 31 July 2025 from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. This narrative review consolidates peer-reviewed studies and industry-validated reports retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from 1 January 2020–31 July 2025. The included sources report on AI and ML technologies applied to small-molecule drug discovery and their translational advancements. AI methods such as deep docking, active learning, and multi-task learning have substantially shortened the time for virtual screening and hit identification, although benchmarking results often give a higher impression of real-world performance than is actually the case. By July 2025, a verification of clinical trial registrations and company disclosures indicates that more than twenty-nine publicly reported AI-driven therapeutic programs have advanced to human studies. Translational potential of AI-guided design is demonstrated by early examples such as DSP-1181 and the TNIK inhibitor rentosertib; however, wider clinical validation remains scarce and depends on prospective evidence. Although the early successes of AI-guided drug design demonstrate the feasibility of AI-enabled discovery, the gap between benchmark performance and real-world outcomes continues to be a limitation. Furthermore, despite progress, broader clinical validation is still limited. Continued evaluation of AI-designed molecules in prospective clinical settings will be essential to verify their true therapeutic value. In spite of the limitations, the growing willingness of big pharmaceutical companies to incorporate the technology in their operations and the appearance of standard regulatory guidance for the use of AI in drug discovery suggest that AI-augmented discovery is no longer an experimental application but rather a maturing component of R&D pipelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lddd.2026.100341
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in drug discovery: From lead discovery to clinical validation (2020–2025)

Vikrant Verma, Dharmendra Kumar
Letters in Drug Design & Discovery
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in drug discovery: From lead discovery to clinical validation (2020–2025)

Vikrant Verma, Dharmendra Kumar
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are fundamentally changing the small-molecule drug discovery process, primarily by moving the workflow from being empirically screened to data-driven, designed ones. This narrative review consolidates peer-reviewed studies and industry-validated reports published between 1 January 2020 and 31 July 2025 from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. This narrative review consolidates peer-reviewed studies and industry-validated reports retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from 1 January 2020–31 July 2025. The included sources report on AI and ML technologies applied to small-molecule drug discovery and their translational advancements. AI methods such as deep docking, active learning, and multi-task learning have substantially shortened the time for virtual screening and hit identification, although benchmarking results often give a higher impression of real-world performance than is actually the case. By July 2025, a verification of clinical trial registrations and company disclosures indicates that more than twenty-nine publicly reported AI-driven therapeutic programs have advanced to human studies. Translational potential of AI-guided design is demonstrated by early examples such as DSP-1181 and the TNIK inhibitor rentosertib; however, wider clinical validation remains scarce and depends on prospective evidence. Although the early successes of AI-guided drug design demonstrate the feasibility of AI-enabled discovery, the gap between benchmark performance and real-world outcomes continues to be a limitation. Furthermore, despite progress, broader clinical validation is still limited. Continued evaluation of AI-designed molecules in prospective clinical settings will be essential to verify their true therapeutic value. In spite of the limitations, the growing willingness of big pharmaceutical companies to incorporate the technology in their operations and the appearance of standard regulatory guidance for the use of AI in drug discovery suggest that AI-augmented discovery is no longer an experimental application but rather a maturing component of R&D pipelines.

Letters in Drug Design & DiscoveryVol. 22(12)
Swami Vivekanand Subharti University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.