Inequity in education through the lens of Social Studies Curriculum using Studies Weekly

This study examines the representation of the Civil Rights Movement within the Studies Weekly elementary social studies curriculum and evaluates its alignment with culturally relevant pedagogy, critical race theory, and civic education frameworks. Through a qualitative content analysis of twelve assessment questions and accompanying lesson materials, the findings reveal consistent patterns of oversimplification, limited historical nuance, and an overreliance on factual recall. Key themes including systemic racism, collective activist, and diverse historical perspectives are minimized or omitted altogether. These omissions contribute to what scholars identify as curriculum bias, where dominant narratives are privileged while marginalized voices are unheard. The results highlighted the need for authentic, inquiry driven social studies instruction that presents complex history accurately, incorporates multiple perspectives, and fosters deep civic understanding. The study underscores the importance of thoughtful curriculum selection and the responsibility of districts to ensure materials both meet standards and reflect historical realities of all communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UTC Scholar (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga)
Published
2026-05-01
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequity in education through the lens of Social Studies Curriculum using Studies Weekly

Emma Roy
UTC Scholar (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga)
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

Inequity in education through the lens of Social Studies Curriculum using Studies Weekly

Emma Roy
article en

Abstract

This study examines the representation of the Civil Rights Movement within the Studies Weekly elementary social studies curriculum and evaluates its alignment with culturally relevant pedagogy, critical race theory, and civic education frameworks. Through a qualitative content analysis of twelve assessment questions and accompanying lesson materials, the findings reveal consistent patterns of oversimplification, limited historical nuance, and an overreliance on factual recall. Key themes including systemic racism, collective activist, and diverse historical perspectives are minimized or omitted altogether. These omissions contribute to what scholars identify as curriculum bias, where dominant narratives are privileged while marginalized voices are unheard. The results highlighted the need for authentic, inquiry driven social studies instruction that presents complex history accurately, incorporates multiple perspectives, and fosters deep civic understanding. The study underscores the importance of thoughtful curriculum selection and the responsibility of districts to ensure materials both meet standards and reflect historical realities of all communities.

UTC Scholar (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inequity in education through the lens of Social Studies Curriculum using Studies Weekly — Emma Roy · UTC Scholar (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS