Prosodic and gestural cues to meaning in developmental language disorder

This doctoral thesis investigates how prosodic and gestural cues support language processing in children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) compared to typically developing peers. Through three eye-tracking experiments with Catalan-speaking children aged 5–10, it examines how multimodal input aids the comprehension of structural and pragmatic meanings and how memory capacities modulate this use. Study 1 shows that prosody facilitates the resolution of syntactic ambiguities, whereas gestures do not enhance comprehension. Study 2 reveals that gestures provide compensatory support for pragmatic inference, especially in indirect requests. Study 3 demonstrates that verbal and visuospatial memory predict individual differences in the integration of multimodal cues. Overall, the results show that prosody serves as a reliable linguistic cue, while gesture plays a compensatory role when processing demands increase. These findings refine models of multimodal communication and have implications for language intervention in children with DLD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Published
2025-12-11
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prosodic and gestural cues to meaning in developmental language disorder

Albert Giberga
Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Language Development and Disorders
article

Prosodic and gestural cues to meaning in developmental language disorder

Albert Giberga
article en

Abstract

This doctoral thesis investigates how prosodic and gestural cues support language processing in children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) compared to typically developing peers. Through three eye-tracking experiments with Catalan-speaking children aged 5–10, it examines how multimodal input aids the comprehension of structural and pragmatic meanings and how memory capacities modulate this use. Study 1 shows that prosody facilitates the resolution of syntactic ambiguities, whereas gestures do not enhance comprehension. Study 2 reveals that gestures provide compensatory support for pragmatic inference, especially in indirect requests. Study 3 demonstrates that verbal and visuospatial memory predict individual differences in the integration of multimodal cues. Overall, the results show that prosody serves as a reliable linguistic cue, while gesture plays a compensatory role when processing demands increase. These findings refine models of multimodal communication and have implications for language intervention in children with DLD.

Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prosodic and gestural cues to meaning in developmental language disorder — Albert Giberga · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS