Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania

Measurement of contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services may overestimate the benefits of the care that is provided, because the quality of care is not captured. It is therefore important to better understand the opportunities and challenges of capturing elements of care quality in routine health information systems (RHIS). This study explored healthcare workers' (HCWs), health sector managers' and policymakers' perspectives on the value and limits of routine health data to understand the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania. We conducted qualitative research during two periods to capture perspectives across facility, district, regional and national levels. In Mtwara region in 2023, we conducted ethnographic observations at two hospital labour wards and 29 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers, hospital leaders, and district/regional managers. In 2025, we carried out 17 additional interviews with regional managers in Mtwara and with key national-level stakeholders. Our findings demonstrate that Tanzania's RHIS provides a valuable but partial picture of quality of care for maternal and neonatal health services. Care processes - including both provision and experience of care - are captured only to a limited extent. Using boundary object theory, we highlight how the same health information must serve diverse stakeholder needs. While there are opportunities to integrate more quality-of-care indicators, standardized RHIS cannot be expected to comprehensively capture the multifaceted nature of care quality. For quality measurement to support meaningful local health service improvement, a flexible, bottom-up approach is essential. However, the current emphasis on top-down oversight acts as a barrier for local-level data use. Measurement of the quality of facility-based care which is relevant and feasible requires a fundamental shift in current RHIS priorities - from systems that extract data for those 'up there' to platforms that also create value for those who provide care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag030
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania

Jil Molenaar, Claudia Hanson, Lenka Beňová, Amani Kikula et al.
Health Policy and Planning
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania

Jil Molenaar, Claudia Hanson, Lenka Beňová, Amani Kikula, Josefien van Olmen, Andrea Pembe, Zamoyoni Julius
article en

Abstract

Measurement of contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services may overestimate the benefits of the care that is provided, because the quality of care is not captured. It is therefore important to better understand the opportunities and challenges of capturing elements of care quality in routine health information systems (RHIS). This study explored healthcare workers' (HCWs), health sector managers' and policymakers' perspectives on the value and limits of routine health data to understand the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania. We conducted qualitative research during two periods to capture perspectives across facility, district, regional and national levels. In Mtwara region in 2023, we conducted ethnographic observations at two hospital labour wards and 29 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers, hospital leaders, and district/regional managers. In 2025, we carried out 17 additional interviews with regional managers in Mtwara and with key national-level stakeholders. Our findings demonstrate that Tanzania's RHIS provides a valuable but partial picture of quality of care for maternal and neonatal health services. Care processes - including both provision and experience of care - are captured only to a limited extent. Using boundary object theory, we highlight how the same health information must serve diverse stakeholder needs. While there are opportunities to integrate more quality-of-care indicators, standardized RHIS cannot be expected to comprehensively capture the multifaceted nature of care quality. For quality measurement to support meaningful local health service improvement, a flexible, bottom-up approach is essential. However, the current emphasis on top-down oversight acts as a barrier for local-level data use. Measurement of the quality of facility-based care which is relevant and feasible requires a fundamental shift in current RHIS priorities - from systems that extract data for those 'up there' to platforms that also create value for those who provide care.

Health Policy and Planning
University of London (GB), University of Antwerp (BE), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), Aga Khan Hospital Dar es Salaam (TZ), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Aga Khan University (TZ), Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.