Sport mega-events, geopolitical renegotiation, and soft power: introducing a framework of pushing and pulling

Sport mega-events have been increasingly used as tools of geopolitical development, particularly by emerging nations. This article examines how sport mega-events contribute to geopolitical renegotiation through a comparative case study analysis of the Taipei 2017 Universiade and Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games. Developing a ‘push-pull’ framework, the study reveals that hosts simultaneously ‘push’ against relationships perceived as constraining whilst ‘pulling’ in more favourable entities. Taipei deployed hard power assets to resist Chinese regional dominance whilst cultivating soft power through Western emulation. Birmingham suppressed hard power displays to project inclusive soft power, leveraging their established nature to construct alternative Commonwealth hierarchies. The article makes two theoretical contributions: proposing a framework of diplomatic renegotiation through Collins’ zones of civilisational attraction; and advancing world-systems theory to capture regional contexts. Challenging scholarship focused primarily on attraction, the analysis reveals that diplomatic ‘pushing’, when combined with ‘pulling’, may constitute strategic resistance rather than failure to attract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport in Society
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2026.2635447
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sport mega-events, geopolitical renegotiation, and soft power: introducing a framework of pushing and pulling

Bradley Sharples, Jung Woo Lee
Sport in Society
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Sport mega-events, geopolitical renegotiation, and soft power: introducing a framework of pushing and pulling

Bradley Sharples, Jung Woo Lee
article en

Abstract

Sport mega-events have been increasingly used as tools of geopolitical development, particularly by emerging nations. This article examines how sport mega-events contribute to geopolitical renegotiation through a comparative case study analysis of the Taipei 2017 Universiade and Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games. Developing a ‘push-pull’ framework, the study reveals that hosts simultaneously ‘push’ against relationships perceived as constraining whilst ‘pulling’ in more favourable entities. Taipei deployed hard power assets to resist Chinese regional dominance whilst cultivating soft power through Western emulation. Birmingham suppressed hard power displays to project inclusive soft power, leveraging their established nature to construct alternative Commonwealth hierarchies. The article makes two theoretical contributions: proposing a framework of diplomatic renegotiation through Collins’ zones of civilisational attraction; and advancing world-systems theory to capture regional contexts. Challenging scholarship focused primarily on attraction, the analysis reveals that diplomatic ‘pushing’, when combined with ‘pulling’, may constitute strategic resistance rather than failure to attract.

Sport in Society
Caesars Entertainment (United States) (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sport mega-events, geopolitical renegotiation, and soft power: introducing a framework of pushing and pulling — Bradley Sharples, Jung Woo Lee · Sport in Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS